Radeon 860M vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB with Radeon 860M, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
2023
16 GB GDDR6, 165 Watt
51.45
+376%

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms 860M by a whopping 376% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking53442
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation65.08no data
Power efficiency25.0957.94
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)
GPU code nameAD106Krackan Point
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date18 May 2023 (2 years ago)March 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4352512
Core clock speed2310 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed2535 MHz3000 MHz
Number of transistors22,900 million34,000 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate344.896.00
Floating-point processing power22.06 TFLOPS3.072 TFLOPS
ROPs488
TMUs13632
Tensor Cores136no data
Ray Tracing Cores348
L0 Cacheno data128 KB
L1 Cache4.3 MB64 KB
L2 Cache32 MB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Length240 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.9-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 51.45
+376%
Radeon 860M 10.80

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB Samples: 1724 22752
+376%
Radeon 860M Samples: 419 4777

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 43112
+284%
Radeon 860M 11223

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 116054
+263%
Radeon 860M 31982

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 32275
+353%
Radeon 860M 7122

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 165263
+323%
Radeon 860M 39086

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 600933
+40.7%
Radeon 860M 426961

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD172
+300%
43
−300%
1440p92
+411%
18−20
−411%
4K55
+450%
10−12
−450%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.90no data
1440p5.42no data
4K9.07no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 270−280
+336%
60−65
−336%
Cyberpunk 2077 176
+633%
24−27
−633%
Hogwarts Legacy 167
+695%
21−24
−695%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+214%
50−55
−214%
Counter-Strike 2 270−280
+336%
60−65
−336%
Cyberpunk 2077 137
+471%
24−27
−471%
Far Cry 5 191
+282%
50
−282%
Fortnite 240−250
+262%
65−70
−262%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+333%
45−50
−333%
Forza Horizon 5 160−170
+364%
35−40
−364%
Hogwarts Legacy 132
+529%
21−24
−529%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+317%
40−45
−317%
Valorant 300−310
+188%
100−110
−188%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+214%
50−55
−214%
Counter-Strike 2 270−280
+336%
60−65
−336%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+66.5%
160−170
−66.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 115
+379%
24−27
−379%
Far Cry 5 182
+304%
45
−304%
Fortnite 240−250
+262%
65−70
−262%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+333%
45−50
−333%
Forza Horizon 5 160−170
+364%
35−40
−364%
Grand Theft Auto V 163
+270%
44
−270%
Hogwarts Legacy 107
+410%
21−24
−410%
Metro Exodus 76
+217%
24−27
−217%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+317%
40−45
−317%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 270
+800%
30−33
−800%
Valorant 300−310
+188%
100−110
−188%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+214%
50−55
−214%
Cyberpunk 2077 103
+329%
24−27
−329%
Far Cry 5 171
+307%
42
−307%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+333%
45−50
−333%
Hogwarts Legacy 80
+281%
21−24
−281%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+317%
40−45
−317%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 132
+340%
30−33
−340%
Valorant 300−310
+400%
60−65
−400%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 240−250
+262%
65−70
−262%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+614%
21−24
−614%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 400−450
+357%
85−90
−357%
Grand Theft Auto V 101
+494%
16−18
−494%
Metro Exodus 79
+464%
14−16
−464%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+400%
35−40
−400%
Valorant 300−350
+178%
120−130
−178%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+332%
30−35
−332%
Cyberpunk 2077 62
+520%
10−11
−520%
Far Cry 5 127
+408%
24−27
−408%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+521%
27−30
−521%
Hogwarts Legacy 58
+383%
12−14
−383%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 96
+465%
16−18
−465%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
+504%
24−27
−504%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+1067%
6−7
−1067%
Grand Theft Auto V 101
+339%
21−24
−339%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+517%
6−7
−517%
Metro Exodus 48
+586%
7−8
−586%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 79
+464%
14−16
−464%
Valorant 300−350
+402%
60−65
−402%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+527%
14−16
−527%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+400%
14−16
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
+575%
4−5
−575%
Far Cry 5 65
+442%
12−14
−442%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+525%
20−22
−525%
Hogwarts Legacy 31
+417%
6−7
−417%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+773%
10−12
−773%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+618%
10−12
−618%

This is how RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and Radeon 860M compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 300% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 411% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 450% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 1067% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB surpassed Radeon 860M in all 60 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 51.45 10.80
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 15 Watt

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB has a 376.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 860M, on the other hand, has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 1000% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 860M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is a desktop graphics card while Radeon 860M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
AMD Radeon 860M
Radeon 860M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 1732 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 12 votes

Rate Radeon 860M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB or Radeon 860M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.