RTX A1000 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB with RTX A1000, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
2023
16 GB GDDR6, 165 Watt
59.40
+111%

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms RTX A1000 by a whopping 111% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking34202
Place by popularity90not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation63.09no data
Power efficiency24.8438.89
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameAD106GA107
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date18 May 2023 (1 year ago)16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores43522304
Core clock speed2310 MHz727 MHz
Boost clock speed2535 MHz1462 MHz
Number of transistors22,900 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate344.8105.3
Floating-point processing power22.06 TFLOPS6.737 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs13672
Tensor Cores13672
Ray Tracing Cores3418

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Length240 mm163 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.98.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 59.40
+111%
RTX A1000 28.18

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 22837
+111%
RTX A1000 10835

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD173
+116%
80−85
−116%
1440p94
+135%
40−45
−135%
4K57
+111%
27−30
−111%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.88no data
1440p5.31no data
4K8.75no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+112%
65−70
−112%
Elden Ring 167
+123%
75−80
−123%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+113%
55−60
−113%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+112%
65−70
−112%
Forza Horizon 4 344
+115%
160−170
−115%
Metro Exodus 160
+113%
75−80
−113%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+116%
50−55
−116%
Valorant 260−270
+123%
120−130
−123%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+113%
55−60
−113%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+112%
65−70
−112%
Dota 2 163
+117%
75−80
−117%
Elden Ring 220−230
+123%
100−105
−123%
Far Cry 5 139
+114%
65−70
−114%
Fortnite 230−240
+112%
110−120
−112%
Forza Horizon 4 272
+127%
120−130
−127%
Grand Theft Auto V 163
+117%
75−80
−117%
Metro Exodus 127
+112%
60−65
−112%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+115%
100−105
−115%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+116%
50−55
−116%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+118%
80−85
−118%
Valorant 260−270
+123%
120−130
−123%
World of Tanks 270−280
+115%
130−140
−115%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+113%
55−60
−113%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+112%
65−70
−112%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+115%
55−60
−115%
Forza Horizon 4 235
+114%
110−120
−114%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+115%
100−105
−115%
Valorant 260−270
+123%
120−130
−123%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 101
+124%
45−50
−124%
Elden Ring 140−150
+122%
65−70
−122%
Grand Theft Auto V 101
+124%
45−50
−124%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+119%
80−85
−119%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+130%
30−33
−130%
World of Tanks 350−400
+117%
180−190
−117%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+118%
40−45
−118%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+143%
30−33
−143%
Far Cry 5 160−170
+113%
75−80
−113%
Forza Horizon 4 153
+119%
70−75
−119%
Metro Exodus 119
+116%
55−60
−116%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 96
+113%
45−50
−113%
Valorant 230−240
+111%
110−120
−111%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+130%
30−33
−130%
Dota 2 101
+124%
45−50
−124%
Elden Ring 70−75
+111%
35−40
−111%
Grand Theft Auto V 101
+124%
45−50
−124%
Metro Exodus 48
+129%
21−24
−129%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+120%
95−100
−120%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+114%
21−24
−114%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 101
+124%
45−50
−124%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+114%
35−40
−114%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+130%
30−33
−130%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+133%
45−50
−133%
Fortnite 95−100
+113%
45−50
−113%
Forza Horizon 4 80
+129%
35−40
−129%
Valorant 130−140
+117%
60−65
−117%

This is how RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and RTX A1000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 116% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 135% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 111% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 59.40 28.18
Recency 18 May 2023 16 April 2024
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 50 Watt

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB has a 110.8% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

RTX A1000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, and 230% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A1000 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is a desktop card while RTX A1000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
NVIDIA RTX A1000
RTX A1000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 976 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 22 votes

Rate RTX A1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.