ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3870 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB with Mobility Radeon HD 3870, including specs and performance data.
4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms Mobility HD 3870 by a whopping 4294% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 58 | 1079 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 64.27 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 25.22 | 1.72 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) | TeraScale (2005−2013) |
| GPU code name | AD106 | M88 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 18 May 2023 (2 years ago) | 4 June 2008 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4352 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 2310 MHz | 660 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2535 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 22,900 million | 666 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 55 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 165 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 344.8 | 10.56 |
| Floating-point processing power | 22.06 TFLOPS | 0.4224 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48 | 16 |
| TMUs | 136 | 16 |
| Tensor Cores | 136 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | no data |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB | 256 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | large |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 240 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 54.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | N/A |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | N/A |
| CUDA | 8.9 | - |
| DLSS | + | - |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 172
+5633%
| 3−4
−5633%
|
| 1440p | 92
+4500%
| 2−3
−4500%
|
| 4K | 55
+5400%
| 1−2
−5400%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | 2.90 | no data |
| 1440p | 5.42 | no data |
| 4K | 9.07 | no data |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 270−280
+4550%
|
6−7
−4550%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 176
+5767%
|
3−4
−5767%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 167
+2683%
|
6−7
−2683%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 160−170
+15900%
|
1−2
−15900%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 270−280
+4550%
|
6−7
−4550%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 137
+4467%
|
3−4
−4467%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 191
+6267%
|
3−4
−6267%
|
| Fortnite | 240−250
+8100%
|
3−4
−8100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 210−220
+2550%
|
8−9
−2550%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 160−170
+16700%
|
1−2
−16700%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 132
+2100%
|
6−7
−2100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+1844%
|
9−10
−1844%
|
| Valorant | 300−310
+809%
|
30−35
−809%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 160−170
+15900%
|
1−2
−15900%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 270−280
+4550%
|
6−7
−4550%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280
+859%
|
27−30
−859%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 115
+3733%
|
3−4
−3733%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 182
+5967%
|
3−4
−5967%
|
| Fortnite | 240−250
+8100%
|
3−4
−8100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 210−220
+2550%
|
8−9
−2550%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 160−170
+16700%
|
1−2
−16700%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 163
+16200%
|
1−2
−16200%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 107
+1683%
|
6−7
−1683%
|
| Metro Exodus | 130
+6400%
|
2−3
−6400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+1844%
|
9−10
−1844%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 270
+3757%
|
7−8
−3757%
|
| Valorant | 300−310
+809%
|
30−35
−809%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 160−170
+15900%
|
1−2
−15900%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 103
+3333%
|
3−4
−3333%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 171
+5600%
|
3−4
−5600%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 210−220
+2550%
|
8−9
−2550%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 80
+1233%
|
6−7
−1233%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+1844%
|
9−10
−1844%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 132
+1786%
|
7−8
−1786%
|
| Valorant | 300−310
+809%
|
30−35
−809%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 240−250
+8100%
|
3−4
−8100%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 150−160
+3825%
|
4−5
−3825%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 400−450
+4938%
|
8−9
−4938%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 101
+4950%
|
2−3
−4950%
|
| Metro Exodus | 79
+7800%
|
1−2
−7800%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+1358%
|
12−14
−1358%
|
| Valorant | 300−350
+8525%
|
4−5
−8525%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 130−140
+4367%
|
3−4
−4367%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 62 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 127
+12600%
|
1−2
−12600%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 170−180
+5700%
|
3−4
−5700%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 58
+5700%
|
1−2
−5700%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 96
+4700%
|
2−3
−4700%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 150−160
+7450%
|
2−3
−7450%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 70−75
+6900%
|
1−2
−6900%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 101
+573%
|
14−16
−573%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 48
+4700%
|
1−2
−4700%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 79
+7800%
|
1−2
−7800%
|
| Valorant | 300−350
+5083%
|
6−7
−5083%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 90−95
+4550%
|
2−3
−4550%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 70−75
+6900%
|
1−2
−6900%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 27 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 65
+6400%
|
1−2
−6400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 120−130
+6150%
|
2−3
−6150%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 31 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 95−100
+4700%
|
2−3
−4700%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 75−80
+3850%
|
2−3
−3850%
|
Full HD
High
| Dota 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
This is how RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and ATI Mobility HD 3870 compete in popular games:
- RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 5633% faster in 1080p
- RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 4500% faster in 1440p
- RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 5400% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Forza Horizon 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 16700% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB performs better in 46 tests (94%)
- there's a draw in 3 tests (6%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 51.41 | 1.17 |
| Recency | 18 May 2023 | 4 June 2008 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 512 MB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 55 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 165 Watt | 55 Watt |
RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB has a 4294% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.
ATI Mobility HD 3870, on the other hand, has 200% lower power consumption.
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 3870 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is a desktop graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 3870 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
