Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB with Iris Pro Graphics 580, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
2023
16 GB GDDR6, 165 Watt
59.30
+1141%

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 580 by a whopping 1141% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking36642
Place by popularity73not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation63.90no data
Power efficiency24.6421.85
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameAD106Skylake GT4e
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date18 May 2023 (1 year ago)1 September 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4352576
Core clock speed2310 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed2535 MHz950 MHz
Number of transistors22,900 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm14 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate344.868.40
Floating-point processing power22.06 TFLOPS1.094 TFLOPS
ROPs489
TMUs13672
Tensor Cores136no data
Ray Tracing Cores34no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8Ring Bus
Length240 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount16 GB64 GB
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.9-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 59.30
+1141%
Iris Pro Graphics 580 4.78

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 22850
+1141%
Iris Pro Graphics 580 1841

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 43112
+1239%
Iris Pro Graphics 580 3220

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 32275
+1596%
Iris Pro Graphics 580 1903

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 165263
+1032%
Iris Pro Graphics 580 14594

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 600933
+225%
Iris Pro Graphics 580 184880

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD175
+821%
19
−821%
1440p93
+1229%
7−8
−1229%
4K57
+1325%
4−5
−1325%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.85no data
1440p5.37no data
4K8.75no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 120−130
+846%
12−14
−846%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100−110
+1980%
5−6
−1980%
Battlefield 5 180−190
+1475%
12−14
−1475%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+1010%
10−11
−1010%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+1010%
10−11
−1010%
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150
+1000%
12−14
−1000%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+653%
30−33
−653%
Hitman 3 120−130
+1110%
10−11
−1110%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+623%
30−35
−623%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+1300%
10−12
−1300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+792%
12−14
−792%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 230−240
+1306%
16−18
−1306%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+222%
45−50
−222%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 120−130
+846%
12−14
−846%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100−110
+1980%
5−6
−1980%
Battlefield 5 180−190
+1475%
12−14
−1475%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+1010%
10−11
−1010%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+1010%
10−11
−1010%
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150
+1000%
12−14
−1000%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+653%
30−33
−653%
Hitman 3 120−130
+1110%
10−11
−1110%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+623%
30−35
−623%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+1300%
10−12
−1300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+792%
12−14
−792%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 272
+1500%
16−18
−1500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+629%
16−18
−629%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+222%
45−50
−222%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 120−130
+846%
12−14
−846%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100−110
+1980%
5−6
−1980%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+1010%
10−11
−1010%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+1010%
10−11
−1010%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+653%
30−33
−653%
Hitman 3 120−130
+1110%
10−11
−1110%
Horizon Zero Dawn 230
+642%
30−35
−642%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 235
+1282%
16−18
−1282%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 132
+676%
16−18
−676%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+222%
45−50
−222%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+792%
12−14
−792%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
+1333%
9−10
−1333%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
+1229%
7−8
−1229%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+1600%
4−5
−1600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+1340%
5−6
−1340%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
+1650%
4−5
−1650%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+1280%
5−6
−1280%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+2610%
10−11
−2610%
Hitman 3 80−85
+833%
9−10
−833%
Horizon Zero Dawn 173
+1473%
10−12
−1473%
Metro Exodus 119
+5850%
2−3
−5850%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 153
+1175%
12−14
−1175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 96
+2300%
4−5
−2300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 230−240
+670%
30−33
−670%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+1022%
9−10
−1022%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+2133%
3−4
−2133%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+1767%
3−4
−1767%
Hitman 3 50−55
+4900%
1−2
−4900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+4300%
5−6
−4300%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+8600%
1−2
−8600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 79
+7800%
1−2
−7800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+1433%
3−4
−1433%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+2100%
2−3
−2100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+2000%
2−3
−2000%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+1900%
2−3
−1900%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+2200%
4−5
−2200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80
+1233%
6−7
−1233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+3400%
1−2
−3400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+1080%
5−6
−1080%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1

This is how RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and Iris Pro Graphics 580 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 821% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 1229% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 1325% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 8600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is ahead in 63 tests (93%)
  • there's a draw in 5 tests (7%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 59.30 4.78
Recency 18 May 2023 1 September 2015
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 64 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 15 Watt

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB has a 1140.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

Iris Pro Graphics 580, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 1000% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Pro Graphics 580 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is a desktop card while Iris Pro Graphics 580 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
Iris Pro Graphics 580

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 842 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 17 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics 580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.