GeForce FX 5200 vs RTX 3090

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3090 and GeForce FX 5200, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 3090
2020
24 GB GDDR6X, 350 Watt
59.67
+298250%

RTX 3090 outperforms FX 5200 by a whopping 298250% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking291503
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.97no data
Power efficiency13.47no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameGA102NV18 C1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 September 2020 (4 years ago)6 March 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 $69.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10496no data
Core clock speed1395 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed1695 MHzno data
Number of transistors28,300 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Wattno data
Texture fill rate556.01.000
Floating-point processing power35.58 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1122
TMUs3284
Tensor Cores328no data
Ray Tracing Cores82no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16AGP 8x
Length336 mmno data
Width3-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XDDR
Maximum RAM amount24 GB128 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1219 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth936.2 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)8.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA8.5-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 3090 59.67
+298250%
FX 5200 0.02

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3090 26666
+380843%
FX 5200 7

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD193-0−1
1440p127-0−1
4K85-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p7.77no data
1440p11.80no data
4K17.64no data

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 331 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 349 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 209 0−1
Atomic Heart 262 0−1
Battlefield 5 172 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 347 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 178 0−1
Far Cry 5 208 0−1
Fortnite 300−350 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 254 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 210 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 0−1
Valorant 350−400 0−1
Atomic Heart 156 0−1
Battlefield 5 158 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 309 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 154 0−1
Dota 2 217 0−1
Far Cry 5 196 0−1
Fortnite 300−350 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 247 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 195 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 171 0−1
Metro Exodus 176 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 369 0−1
Valorant 350−400 0−1
Battlefield 5 146 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 136 0−1
Dota 2 213 0−1
Far Cry 5 183 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 217 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 182 0−1
Valorant 296 0−1
Fortnite 300−350 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 231 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 450−500 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 150 0−1
Metro Exodus 115 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 0−1
Valorant 400−450 0−1
Battlefield 5 130 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 93 0−1
Far Cry 5 171 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 197 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 153 0−1
Fortnite 150−160 0−1
Atomic Heart 55−60 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 59 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 182 0−1
Metro Exodus 76 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 154 0−1
Valorant 300−350 0−1
Battlefield 5 113 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 85−90 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 46 0−1
Dota 2 202 0−1
Far Cry 5 108 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 153 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 0−1
Fortnite 75−80 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 59.67 0.02
Recency 1 September 2020 6 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 8 nm 150 nm

RTX 3090 has a 298250% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, a 19100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1775% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3090 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX 5200 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GeForce RTX 3090
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200
GeForce FX 5200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.2
79416 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4
258 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3090 or GeForce FX 5200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.