FirePro D700 vs GeForce RTX 3090

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3090 with FirePro D700, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3090
2020
24 GB GDDR6X, 350 Watt
69.50
+394%

RTX 3090 outperforms D700 by a whopping 394% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking24373
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.96no data
Power efficiency13.693.54
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameGA102Tahiti
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 September 2020 (4 years ago)18 January 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores104962048
Core clock speed1395 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed1695 MHzno data
Number of transistors28,300 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt274 Watt
Texture fill rate556.0108.8
Floating-point processing power35.58 TFLOPS3.482 TFLOPS
ROPs11232
TMUs328128
Tensor Cores328no data
Ray Tracing Cores82no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length336 mm279 mm
Width3-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount24 GB6 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1219 MHz1370 MHz
Memory bandwidth936.2 GB/s263.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.21.2.131
CUDA8.5-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD198
+395%
40−45
−395%
1440p128
+433%
24−27
−433%
4K87
+444%
16−18
−444%

Cost per frame, $

1080p7.57no data
1440p11.71no data
4K17.23no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 220
+450%
40−45
−450%
Cyberpunk 2077 207
+418%
40−45
−418%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 102
+467%
18−20
−467%
Counter-Strike 2 188
+437%
35−40
−437%
Cyberpunk 2077 151
+403%
30−33
−403%
Forza Horizon 4 505
+405%
100−105
−405%
Forza Horizon 5 184
+426%
35−40
−426%
Metro Exodus 169
+463%
30−33
−463%
Red Dead Redemption 2 130
+442%
24−27
−442%
Valorant 393
+424%
75−80
−424%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+457%
21−24
−457%
Counter-Strike 2 161
+437%
30−33
−437%
Cyberpunk 2077 135
+400%
27−30
−400%
Dota 2 186
+431%
35−40
−431%
Far Cry 5 147
+444%
27−30
−444%
Fortnite 270−280
+396%
55−60
−396%
Forza Horizon 4 402
+403%
80−85
−403%
Forza Horizon 5 182
+420%
35−40
−420%
Grand Theft Auto V 171
+470%
30−33
−470%
Metro Exodus 150
+400%
30−33
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+438%
40−45
−438%
Red Dead Redemption 2 132
+450%
24−27
−450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+397%
35−40
−397%
Valorant 222
+455%
40−45
−455%
World of Tanks 270−280
+407%
55−60
−407%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 95
+428%
18−20
−428%
Counter-Strike 2 146
+441%
27−30
−441%
Cyberpunk 2077 121
+404%
24−27
−404%
Dota 2 213
+433%
40−45
−433%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+446%
24−27
−446%
Forza Horizon 4 351
+401%
70−75
−401%
Forza Horizon 5 159
+430%
30−33
−430%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+438%
40−45
−438%
Valorant 296
+438%
55−60
−438%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 150
+400%
30−33
−400%
Grand Theft Auto V 150
+400%
30−33
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+400%
35−40
−400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 92
+411%
18−20
−411%
World of Tanks 450−500
+414%
95−100
−414%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 91
+406%
18−20
−406%
Counter-Strike 2 95
+428%
18−20
−428%
Cyberpunk 2077 87
+444%
16−18
−444%
Far Cry 5 160−170
+433%
30−33
−433%
Forza Horizon 4 266
+432%
50−55
−432%
Forza Horizon 5 134
+396%
27−30
−396%
Metro Exodus 139
+415%
27−30
−415%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 152
+407%
30−33
−407%
Valorant 295
+436%
55−60
−436%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 59
+490%
10−11
−490%
Dota 2 182
+420%
35−40
−420%
Grand Theft Auto V 182
+420%
35−40
−420%
Metro Exodus 76
+443%
14−16
−443%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+423%
40−45
−423%
Red Dead Redemption 2 64
+433%
12−14
−433%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 182
+420%
35−40
−420%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 91
+406%
18−20
−406%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+438%
16−18
−438%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+400%
9−10
−400%
Dota 2 202
+405%
40−45
−405%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+400%
21−24
−400%
Fortnite 95−100
+433%
18−20
−433%
Forza Horizon 4 159
+430%
30−33
−430%
Forza Horizon 5 83
+419%
16−18
−419%
Valorant 188
+437%
35−40
−437%

This is how RTX 3090 and FirePro D700 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3090 is 395% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3090 is 433% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3090 is 444% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 69.50 14.06
Recency 1 September 2020 18 January 2014
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 274 Watt

RTX 3090 has a 394.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

FirePro D700, on the other hand, has 27.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3090 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro D700 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3090 is a desktop card while FirePro D700 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GeForce RTX 3090
AMD FirePro D700
FirePro D700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.2 79292 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 38 votes

Rate FirePro D700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.