Arc B570 vs GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Place in the ranking	12	163
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	8.30	81.56
Power efficiency	11.80	15.53
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	Xe2 (2025)
GPU code name	GA102	BMG-G21
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	27 January 2022 (3 years ago)	16 January 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,999	$219

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Arc B570 has 883% better value for money than RTX 3090 Ti.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	10752	2304
Core clock speed	1560 MHz	2500 MHz
Boost clock speed	1860 MHz	2500 MHz
Number of transistors	28,300 million	19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	450 Watt	150 Watt
Texture fill rate	625.0	360.0
Floating-point processing power	40 TFLOPS	11.52 TFLOPS
ROPs	112	80
TMUs	336	144
Tensor Cores	336	144
Ray Tracing Cores	84	18

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	336 mm	272 mm
Width	3-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 16-pin	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	10 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	160 Bit
Memory clock speed	1313 MHz	2375 MHz
Memory bandwidth	1,008 GB/s	380.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	+	+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.4
CUDA	8.6	-
DLSS	+	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3090 Ti 74.60
+128%

Arc B570 32.73

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3090 Ti 29620
+128%

Arc B570 12997

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	220 +132%	95−100 −132%
1440p	153 +135%	65−70 −135%
4K	108 +140%	45−50 −140%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	9.09 −294%	2.31 +294%
1440p	13.07 −288%	3.37 +288%
4K	18.51 −280%	4.87 +280%

Arc B570 has 294% lower cost per frame in 1080p
Arc B570 has 288% lower cost per frame in 1440p
Arc B570 has 280% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	180−190 +140%	75−80 −140%
Cyberpunk 2077	219 +131%	95−100 −131%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +134%	50−55 −134%
Counter-Strike 2	180−190 +140%	75−80 −140%
Cyberpunk 2077	101 +153%	40−45 −153%
Forza Horizon 4	400−450 +132%	190−200 −132%
Forza Horizon 5	200−210 +140%	85−90 −140%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +134%	65−70 −134%
Red Dead Redemption 2	140−150 +137%	60−65 −137%
Valorant	400−450 +137%	180−190 −137%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +134%	50−55 −134%
Counter-Strike 2	180−190 +140%	75−80 −140%
Cyberpunk 2077	86 +146%	35−40 −146%
Dota 2	185 +131%	80−85 −131%
Far Cry 5	136 +147%	55−60 −147%
Fortnite	300−350 +136%	130−140 −136%
Forza Horizon 4	400−450 +132%	190−200 −132%
Forza Horizon 5	207 +130%	90−95 −130%
Grand Theft Auto V	170 +143%	70−75 −143%
Metro Exodus	73 +143%	30−33 −143%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +139%	90−95 −139%
Red Dead Redemption 2	140−150 +137%	60−65 −137%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +132%	75−80 −132%
Valorant	400−450 +137%	180−190 −137%
World of Tanks	270−280 +133%	120−130 −133%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +134%	50−55 −134%
Counter-Strike 2	180−190 +140%	75−80 −140%
Cyberpunk 2077	76 +153%	30−33 −153%
Dota 2	195 +129%	85−90 −129%
Far Cry 5	140−150 +137%	60−65 −137%
Forza Horizon 4	400−450 +132%	190−200 −132%
Forza Horizon 5	200−210 +140%	85−90 −140%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +139%	90−95 −139%
Valorant	400−450 +137%	180−190 −137%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	150−160 +145%	65−70 −145%
Dota 2	151 +132%	65−70 −132%
Grand Theft Auto V	151 +132%	65−70 −132%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +133%	75−80 −133%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95 +133%	40−45 −133%
World of Tanks	500−550 +135%	220−230 −135%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +149%	35−40 −149%
Cyberpunk 2077	52 +148%	21−24 −148%
Far Cry 5	160−170 +129%	70−75 −129%
Forza Horizon 4	300−310 +131%	130−140 −131%
Forza Horizon 5	150 +131%	65−70 −131%
Metro Exodus	130−140 +147%	55−60 −147%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +137%	75−80 −137%
Valorant	350−400 +140%	150−160 −140%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	55−60 +129%	24−27 −129%
Dota 2	181 +141%	75−80 −141%
Grand Theft Auto V	181 +141%	75−80 −141%
Metro Exodus	84 +140%	35−40 −140%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 +132%	90−95 −132%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +137%	27−30 −137%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	181 +141%	75−80 −141%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 +160%	35−40 −160%
Counter-Strike 2	55−60 +129%	24−27 −129%
Cyberpunk 2077	27 +170%	10−11 −170%
Dota 2	184 +130%	80−85 −130%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +133%	45−50 −133%
Fortnite	95−100 +140%	40−45 −140%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 +133%	70−75 −133%
Forza Horizon 5	94 +135%	40−45 −135%
Valorant	210−220 +133%	90−95 −133%

This is how RTX 3090 Ti and Arc B570 compete in popular games:

RTX 3090 Ti is 132% faster in 1080p
RTX 3090 Ti is 135% faster in 1440p
RTX 3090 Ti is 140% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	74.60	32.73
Recency	27 January 2022	16 January 2025
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	10 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	450 Watt	150 Watt