Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS vs GeForce RTX 3080

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3080 with Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3080
2020
10 GB GDDR6X, 320 Watt
65.54
+832%

RTX 3080 outperforms Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS by a whopping 832% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking26556
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation46.38no data
Power efficiency14.1224.23
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)no data
GPU code nameGA102no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 September 2020 (4 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8704768
Core clock speed1440 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1710 MHzno data
Number of transistors28,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)320 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate465.1no data
Floating-point processing power29.77 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96no data
TMUs272no data
Tensor Cores272no data
Ray Tracing Cores68no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length285 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XLPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount10 GBno data
Memory bus width320 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1188 MHz8448 MHz
Memory bandwidth760.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2-
CUDA8.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3080 65.54
+832%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS 7.03

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3080 53713
+1232%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS 4033

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3080 39257
+956%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS 3717

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3080 188064
+573%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS 27960

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD168
+740%
20
−740%
1440p125
+942%
12−14
−942%
4K87
+867%
9−10
−867%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.16no data
1440p5.59no data
4K8.03no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+927%
15
−927%
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160
+838%
16−18
−838%
Elden Ring 250−260
+1150%
20−22
−1150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+432%
21−24
−432%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+1300%
11
−1300%
Cyberpunk 2077 133
+850%
14−16
−850%
Forza Horizon 4 383
+1177%
30
−1177%
Metro Exodus 129
+617%
18−20
−617%
Red Dead Redemption 2 131
+555%
20−22
−555%
Valorant 277
+1054%
24−27
−1054%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+432%
21−24
−432%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+1440%
10
−1440%
Cyberpunk 2077 125
+942%
12−14
−942%
Dota 2 147
+513%
24
−513%
Elden Ring 306
+1430%
20−22
−1430%
Far Cry 5 123
+297%
30−35
−297%
Fortnite 250−260
+510%
40−45
−510%
Forza Horizon 4 326
+1317%
23
−1317%
Grand Theft Auto V 147
+513%
24
−513%
Metro Exodus 119
+561%
18−20
−561%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+277%
55−60
−277%
Red Dead Redemption 2 119
+495%
20−22
−495%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+691%
21−24
−691%
Valorant 200
+733%
24−27
−733%
World of Tanks 270−280
+156%
100−110
−156%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+432%
21−24
−432%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+1825%
8
−1825%
Cyberpunk 2077 117
+875%
12−14
−875%
Dota 2 135
+864%
14−16
−864%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+306%
30−35
−306%
Forza Horizon 4 287
+1411%
19
−1411%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+277%
55−60
−277%
Valorant 268
+1017%
24−27
−1017%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 112
+1300%
8−9
−1300%
Elden Ring 181
+1911%
9−10
−1911%
Grand Theft Auto V 112
+1300%
8−9
−1300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+872%
18−20
−872%
Red Dead Redemption 2 84
+1300%
6−7
−1300%
World of Tanks 400−450
+778%
50−55
−778%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+625%
12−14
−625%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+169%
30−35
−169%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+888%
8−9
−888%
Far Cry 5 160−170
+967%
14−16
−967%
Forza Horizon 4 219
+1464%
14−16
−1464%
Metro Exodus 107
+970%
10−11
−970%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150
+1310%
10−11
−1310%
Valorant 248
+1278%
18−20
−1278%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+7800%
1−2
−7800%
Dota 2 143
+694%
18−20
−694%
Elden Ring 98
+2350%
4−5
−2350%
Grand Theft Auto V 143
+694%
18−20
−694%
Metro Exodus 65
+2067%
3−4
−2067%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+945%
20−22
−945%
Red Dead Redemption 2 56
+1300%
4−5
−1300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 143
+694%
18−20
−694%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+1300%
6−7
−1300%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+7800%
1−2
−7800%
Cyberpunk 2077 41
+925%
4−5
−925%
Dota 2 129
+975%
12−14
−975%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+1213%
8−9
−1213%
Fortnite 95−100
+1271%
7−8
−1271%
Forza Horizon 4 135
+1588%
8−9
−1588%
Valorant 153
+2086%
7−8
−2086%

This is how RTX 3080 and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3080 is 740% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3080 is 942% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3080 is 867% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3080 is 7800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 3080 surpassed Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS in all 54 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 65.54 7.03
Chip lithography 8 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 320 Watt 20 Watt

RTX 3080 has a 832.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 1500% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3080 is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3080 is a desktop card while Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
GeForce RTX 3080
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 6324 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.