GeForce 6200 vs RTX 3080

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3080 and GeForce 6200, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 3080
2020
10 GB GDDR6X, 320 Watt
56.73
+70813%

3080 outperforms 6200 by a whopping 70813% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking431507
Place by popularity77not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation41.16no data
Power efficiency14.27no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameGA102NV43
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 September 2020 (5 years ago)11 October 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 $39.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8704no data
Core clock speed1440 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1710 MHzno data
Number of transistors28,300 million146 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)320 Wattno data
Texture fill rate465.11.200
Floating-point processing power29.77 TFLOPSno data
ROPs962
TMUs2724
Tensor Cores272no data
Ray Tracing Cores68no data
L1 Cache8.5 MBno data
L2 Cache5 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length285 mm190 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XDDR
Maximum RAM amount10 GB128 MB
Memory bus width320 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1188 MHz275 MHz
Memory bandwidth760.3 GB/s8.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.53.0
OpenGL4.62.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA8.5-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 3080 56.73
+70813%
GeForce 6200 0.08

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3080 25086
+67700%
Samples: 25934
GeForce 6200 37
Samples: 453

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD164-0−1
1440p122-0−1
4K85-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.26no data
1440p5.73no data
4K8.22no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 290−300 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 140−150 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 172 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 290−300 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 138 0−1
Far Cry 5 157 0−1
Fortnite 280−290 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 230−240 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 152 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 135 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 0−1
Valorant 300−350 0−1

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 156 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 290−300 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 134 0−1
Dota 2 147 0−1
Far Cry 5 150 0−1
Fortnite 280−290 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 230−240 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 140 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 147 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 123 0−1
Metro Exodus 128 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 303 0−1
Valorant 300−350 0−1

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 145 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 131 0−1
Dota 2 135 0−1
Far Cry 5 140 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 230−240 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 101 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 149 0−1
Valorant 268 0−1

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 280−290 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 170−180 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 450−500 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 112 0−1
Metro Exodus 95 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 0−1
Valorant 400−450 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 124 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 86 0−1
Far Cry 5 135 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 200−210 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 84 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160 0−1

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 80−85 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 143 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45 0−1
Metro Exodus 65 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 115 0−1
Valorant 300−350 0−1

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 91 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 80−85 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 43 0−1
Dota 2 129 0−1
Far Cry 5 94 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 150−160 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 49 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 56.73 0.08
Recency 1 September 2020 11 October 2004
Maximum RAM amount 10 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 8 nm 110 nm

RTX 3080 has a 70812.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 7900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1275% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3080 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 6200 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
GeForce RTX 3080
NVIDIA GeForce 6200
GeForce 6200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 7487 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 85 votes

Rate GeForce 6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3080 or GeForce 6200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.