GMA 3150 vs GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2861594
Place by popularity59not in top-100
Power efficiency28.45no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameGN20-P0Pineview
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date11 May 2021 (4 years ago)9 May 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204816
Core clock speed1238 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data123 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)13 Watt
Texture fill rateno data0.8
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0128 TFLOPS
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCI

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed12000 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_29.0c
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD62no data
1440p43no data
4K27no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 170 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 66 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 93 no data
Counter-Strike 2 125 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 52 no data
Escape from Tarkov 85−90 no data
Far Cry 5 68 no data
Fortnite 110−120 no data
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 no data
Forza Horizon 5 87 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90 no data
Valorant 160−170 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 89 no data
Counter-Strike 2 36 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 41 no data
Dota 2 118 no data
Escape from Tarkov 85−90 no data
Far Cry 5 64 no data
Fortnite 110−120 no data
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 no data
Forza Horizon 5 77 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 86 no data
Metro Exodus 49 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 81 no data
Valorant 160−170 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 83 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 34 no data
Dota 2 112 no data
Escape from Tarkov 85−90 no data
Far Cry 5 61 no data
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46 no data
Valorant 160−170 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 110−120 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 48 no data
Metro Exodus 29 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
Valorant 190−200 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 66 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 18 no data
Escape from Tarkov 50−55 no data
Far Cry 5 49 no data
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 50−55 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 44 no data
Metro Exodus 17 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29 no data
Valorant 130−140 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35 no data
Counter-Strike 2 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 6 no data
Dota 2 62 no data
Escape from Tarkov 21−24 no data
Far Cry 5 19 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 24−27 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 May 2021 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 8 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 13 Watt

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 462.5% more advanced lithography process.

GMA 3150, on the other hand, has 361.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and GMA 3150. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
Intel GMA 3150
GMA 3150

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1906 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 174 votes

Rate GMA 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile or GMA 3150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.