ATI Radeon X600 PRO vs GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3080 Ti and Radeon X600 PRO, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 3080 Ti
2021
12 GB GDDR6X, 350 Watt
70.35
+41282%

RTX 3080 Ti outperforms ATI X600 PRO by a whopping 41282% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking191411
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation22.39no data
Power efficiency13.870.33
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameGA102RV380
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date31 May 2021 (3 years ago)1 September 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10240no data
Core clock speed1365 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1665 MHzno data
Number of transistors28,300 million75 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt36 Watt
Texture fill rate532.81.600
Floating-point processing power34.1 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1124
TMUs3204
Tensor Cores320no data
Ray Tracing Cores80no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length285 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XDDR
Maximum RAM amount12 GB128 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1188 MHz300 MHz
Memory bandwidth912.4 GB/s9.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0b
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA8.6-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3080 Ti 70.35
+41282%
ATI X600 PRO 0.17

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3080 Ti 27046
+40267%
ATI X600 PRO 67

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2140−1
1440p146-0−1
4K98-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.60no data
1440p8.21no data
4K12.23no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 160−170 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 219 0−1
Elden Ring 212 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 160−170 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 92 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 489
+48800%
1−2
−48800%
Metro Exodus 174 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130 0−1
Valorant 350−400 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 160−170 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 80 0−1
Dota 2 194 0−1
Elden Ring 328 0−1
Far Cry 5 140 0−1
Fortnite 270−280 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 407 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 174 0−1
Metro Exodus 151 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 56 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180 0−1
Valorant 350−400 0−1
World of Tanks 270−280 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 160−170 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 136 0−1
Dota 2 217 0−1
Far Cry 5 130−140 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 359 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220 0−1
Valorant 388 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 153 0−1
Elden Ring 194 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 153 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 93 0−1
World of Tanks 450−500
+49500%
1−2
−49500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 90−95 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 92 0−1
Far Cry 5 160−170 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 269 0−1
Metro Exodus 141 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160 0−1
Valorant 316 0−1

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 85−90 0−1
Dota 2 182 0−1
Elden Ring 104 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 182 0−1
Metro Exodus 76 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 63 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 182 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 85−90 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 46 0−1
Dota 2 211 0−1
Far Cry 5 100−110 0−1
Fortnite 95−100 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 161 0−1
Valorant 191 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 70.35 0.17
Recency 31 May 2021 1 September 2004
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 8 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 36 Watt

RTX 3080 Ti has a 41282.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X600 PRO, on the other hand, has 872.2% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X600 PRO in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
ATI Radeon X600 PRO
Radeon X600 PRO

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 11034 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 11 votes

Rate Radeon X600 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.