Arc A770 vs GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3080 Ti and Arc A770, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 3080 Ti
2021
12 GB GDDR6X, 350 Watt
70.35
+106%

RTX 3080 Ti outperforms Arc A770 by a whopping 106% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking19153
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation22.7155.96
Power efficiency13.8710.49
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGA102DG2-512
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date31 May 2021 (3 years ago)12 October 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 $329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Arc A770 has 146% better value for money than RTX 3080 Ti.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102404096
Core clock speed1365 MHz2100 MHz
Boost clock speed1665 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors28,300 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate532.8614.4
Floating-point processing power34.1 TFLOPS19.66 TFLOPS
ROPs112128
TMUs320256
Tensor Cores320512
Ray Tracing Cores8032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length285 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB16 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1188 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth912.4 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA8.6-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3080 Ti 70.35
+106%
Arc A770 34.20

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3080 Ti 27050
+106%
Arc A770 13152

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3080 Ti 60980
+47.6%
Arc A770 41303

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 3080 Ti 120236
+16.4%
Arc A770 103295

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3080 Ti 47113
+44.2%
Arc A770 32666

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3080 Ti 218185
+56.8%
Arc A770 139166

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3080 Ti 785365
+25%
Arc A770 628292

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD214
+91.1%
112
−91.1%
1440p146
+128%
64
−128%
4K98
+139%
41
−139%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.60
−90.7%
2.94
+90.7%
1440p8.21
−59.8%
5.14
+59.8%
4K12.23
−52.5%
8.02
+52.5%
  • Arc A770 has 91% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • Arc A770 has 60% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • Arc A770 has 52% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 160−170
+43.1%
116
−43.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 219
+204%
70−75
−204%
Elden Ring 212
+141%
88
−141%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+21.9%
95−100
−21.9%
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
+67.7%
99
−67.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 92
+27.8%
70−75
−27.8%
Forza Horizon 4 489
+60.9%
304
−60.9%
Metro Exodus 174
+45%
120
−45%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+85.5%
65−70
−85.5%
Valorant 350−400
+162%
130−140
−162%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+21.9%
95−100
−21.9%
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
+88.6%
88
−88.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 80
+11.1%
70−75
−11.1%
Dota 2 194
+84.8%
105
−84.8%
Elden Ring 328
+180%
110−120
−180%
Far Cry 5 140
+97.2%
71
−97.2%
Fortnite 270−280
+77.6%
150−160
−77.6%
Forza Horizon 4 407
+57.8%
258
−57.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 174
+65.7%
105
−65.7%
Metro Exodus 151
+52.5%
99
−52.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+13.8%
180−190
−13.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 56
−23.2%
65−70
+23.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+47.5%
110−120
−47.5%
Valorant 350−400
+162%
130−140
−162%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0.4%
270−280
−0.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+21.9%
95−100
−21.9%
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
+100%
83
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 136
+88.9%
70−75
−88.9%
Dota 2 217
+117%
100−105
−117%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+46.2%
90−95
−46.2%
Forza Horizon 4 359
+66.2%
216
−66.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+13.8%
180−190
−13.8%
Valorant 388
+185%
130−140
−185%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 153
+240%
45
−240%
Elden Ring 194
+194%
65−70
−194%
Grand Theft Auto V 153
+240%
45
−240%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 93
+182%
30−35
−182%
World of Tanks 450−500
+126%
210−220
−126%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+31.8%
65−70
−31.8%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+59.3%
59
−59.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 92
+179%
30−35
−179%
Far Cry 5 160−170
+46.8%
100−110
−46.8%
Forza Horizon 4 269
+70.3%
158
−70.3%
Metro Exodus 141
+54.9%
91
−54.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+162%
60
−162%
Valorant 316
+210%
100−110
−210%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+214%
28
−214%
Dota 2 182
+279%
48
−279%
Elden Ring 104
+235%
30−35
−235%
Grand Theft Auto V 182
+279%
48
−279%
Metro Exodus 76
+61.7%
47
−61.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+93.5%
100−110
−93.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 63
+186%
21−24
−186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 182
+279%
48
−279%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+133%
35−40
−133%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+159%
30−35
−159%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
+229%
14−16
−229%
Dota 2 211
+111%
100−105
−111%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+119%
45−50
−119%
Fortnite 95−100
+109%
45−50
−109%
Forza Horizon 4 161
+80.9%
89
−80.9%
Valorant 191
+267%
50−55
−267%

This is how RTX 3080 Ti and Arc A770 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3080 Ti is 91% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3080 Ti is 128% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3080 Ti is 139% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3080 Ti is 279% faster.
  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A770 is 23% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3080 Ti is ahead in 59 tests (97%)
  • Arc A770 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 70.35 34.20
Recency 31 May 2021 12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 225 Watt

RTX 3080 Ti has a 105.7% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc A770, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 55.6% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A770 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Arc A770
Arc A770

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 11025 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 5350 votes

Rate Arc A770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.