ATI Radeon 9550 vs GeForce RTX 3060

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3060 and Radeon 9550, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 3060
2021
12 GB GDDR6, 170 Watt
44.34
+49167%

RTX 3060 outperforms ATI 9550 by a whopping 49167% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking831461
Place by popularity4not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation70.83no data
Power efficiency17.86no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameGA106RV350
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)1 October 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584no data
Core clock speed1320 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed1777 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,000 million60 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Wattno data
Texture fill rate199.01.000
Floating-point processing power12.74 TFLOPSno data
ROPs484
TMUs1124
Tensor Cores112no data
Ray Tracing Cores28no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16AGP 8x
Length242 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount12 GB64 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1875 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth360.0 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA8.6-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3060 44.34
+49167%
ATI 9550 0.09

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3060 17085
+50150%
ATI 9550 34

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD125-0−1
1440p78-0−1
4K50-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.63no data
1440p4.22no data
4K6.58no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 79 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 102 0−1
Battlefield 5 140−150 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 78 0−1
Far Cry 5 90−95 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 200−210 0−1
Hitman 3 120 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180 0−1
Metro Exodus 130−140 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 160−170 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 85 0−1
Battlefield 5 140−150 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 75 0−1
Far Cry 5 90−95 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 200−210 0−1
Hitman 3 116 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180 0−1
Metro Exodus 130−140 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 180 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 64 0−1
Far Cry 5 90−95 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 200−210 0−1
Hitman 3 101 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 142 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 154 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 73 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 59 0−1

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 39 0−1
Far Cry 5 50−55 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 240−250 0−1
Hitman 3 68 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 106 0−1
Metro Exodus 89 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 115 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 200−210 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80 0−1

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40 0−1
Hitman 3 45 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200 0−1
Metro Exodus 55−60 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 38 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 18 0−1
Far Cry 5 27−30 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 67 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 27 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 44.34 0.09
Recency 12 January 2021 1 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 8 nm 130 nm

RTX 3060 has a 49166.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, a 19100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3060 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9550 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
ATI Radeon 9550
Radeon 9550

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 28805 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 56 votes

Rate Radeon 9550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.