GeForce2 Ultra vs GeForce RTX 3060

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3060 and GeForce2 Ultra, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 3060
2021
12 GB GDDR6, 170 Watt
44.45
+222150%

RTX 3060 outperforms GeForce2 Ultra by a whopping 222150% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking821499
Place by popularity4not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation70.21no data
Power efficiency18.03no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameGA106NV15 A4
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 January 2021 (4 years ago)14 August 2000 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 $499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 3060 and GeForce2 Ultra have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584no data
Core clock speed1320 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed1777 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,000 million25 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Wattno data
Texture fill rate199.02.000
Floating-point processing power12.74 TFLOPSno data
ROPs484
TMUs1128
Tensor Cores112no data
Ray Tracing Cores28no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16AGP 4x
Length242 mm183 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount12 GB64 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1875 MHz230 MHz
Memory bandwidth360.0 GB/s7.36 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)7.0
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA8.6-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3060 44.45
+222150%
GeForce2 Ultra 0.02

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3060 17085
+284650%
GeForce2 Ultra 6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120-0−1
1440p71-0−1
4K48-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.74no data
1440p4.63no data
4K6.85no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 95−100 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 79 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 97 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 77 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 226 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 124 0−1
Metro Exodus 120 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90 0−1
Valorant 180−190 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 83 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 72 0−1
Dota 2 146 0−1
Far Cry 5 105 0−1
Fortnite 180−190 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 180 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 96 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 141 0−1
Metro Exodus 87 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160−170 0−1
Valorant 180−190 0−1
World of Tanks 270−280 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 72 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 60 0−1
Dota 2 147 0−1
Far Cry 5 100−110 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 154 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 79 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210 0−1
Valorant 180−190 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 81 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 81 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50 0−1
World of Tanks 280−290 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 42 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 37 0−1
Far Cry 5 140−150 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 115 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 62 0−1
Metro Exodus 89 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85 0−1
Valorant 140−150 0−1

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50 0−1
Dota 2 82 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 82 0−1
Metro Exodus 32 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 82 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 45−50 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 17 0−1
Dota 2 115 0−1
Far Cry 5 65−70 0−1
Fortnite 65−70 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 67 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 36 0−1
Valorant 75−80 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 44.45 0.02
Recency 12 January 2021 14 August 2000
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 8 nm 180 nm

RTX 3060 has a 222150% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 20 years, a 19100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2150% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3060 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce2 Ultra in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra
GeForce2 Ultra

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 29718 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 39 votes

Rate GeForce2 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.