GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs RTX 3060

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3060 with GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3060
2021
12 GB GDDR6, 170 Watt
44.43
+18.4%

RTX 3060 outperforms RTX 4050 Mobile by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking82123
Place by popularity442
Cost-effectiveness evaluation70.38no data
Power efficiency17.9951.60
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGA106AD107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date12 January 2021 (4 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35842560
Core clock speed1320 MHz1455 MHz
Boost clock speed1777 MHz1755 MHz
Number of transistors12,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate199.0140.4
Floating-point processing power12.74 TFLOPS8.986 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs11280
Tensor Cores11280
Ray Tracing Cores2820

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length242 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB6 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1875 MHz16000 GB/s
Memory bandwidth360.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.68.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3060 44.43
+18.4%
RTX 4050 Mobile 37.51

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3060 17085
+18.5%
RTX 4050 Mobile 14423

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3060 28375
RTX 4050 Mobile 30465
+7.4%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 3060 79706
RTX 4050 Mobile 85660
+7.5%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3060 21379
RTX 4050 Mobile 22400
+4.8%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3060 120745
RTX 4050 Mobile 134084
+11%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3060 537787
RTX 4050 Mobile 552112
+2.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD122
+28.4%
95
−28.4%
1440p72
+53.2%
47
−53.2%
4K50
+61.3%
31
−61.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.70no data
1440p4.57no data
4K6.58no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+21.5%
79
−21.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
−30.4%
103
+30.4%
Elden Ring 119
+1.7%
117
−1.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+8.8%
100−110
−8.8%
Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+43.3%
67
−43.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 77
+87.8%
41
−87.8%
Forza Horizon 4 226
+10.8%
204
−10.8%
Metro Exodus 120
+31.9%
90−95
−31.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+14.9%
70−75
−14.9%
Valorant 180−190
−2.2%
185
+2.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+8.8%
100−110
−8.8%
Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+62.7%
59
−62.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 72
+100%
36
−100%
Dota 2 146
+4.3%
140
−4.3%
Elden Ring 149
+16.4%
128
−16.4%
Far Cry 5 105
+8.2%
97
−8.2%
Fortnite 180−190
+12.7%
160−170
−12.7%
Forza Horizon 4 180
+7.1%
168
−7.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 141
+11.9%
126
−11.9%
Metro Exodus 87
+172%
32
−172%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+6.1%
190−200
−6.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+14.9%
70−75
−14.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160−170
+22.7%
130−140
−22.7%
Valorant 180−190
+20.7%
150−160
−20.7%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+8.8%
100−110
−8.8%
Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+123%
43
−123%
Cyberpunk 2077 60
+81.8%
33
−81.8%
Dota 2 147
−10.2%
162
+10.2%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+8.4%
95−100
−8.4%
Forza Horizon 4 154
+6.2%
145
−6.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+6.1%
190−200
−6.1%
Valorant 180−190
+31.2%
138
−31.2%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 81
+39.7%
58
−39.7%
Elden Ring 85
+51.8%
56
−51.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 81
+39.7%
58
−39.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+24.3%
35−40
−24.3%
World of Tanks 280−290
+18.1%
230−240
−18.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+11.4%
70−75
−11.4%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+88%
25
−88%
Cyberpunk 2077 37
+106%
18
−106%
Far Cry 5 140−150
+18.2%
120−130
−18.2%
Forza Horizon 4 115
+36.9%
84
−36.9%
Metro Exodus 89
+8.5%
80−85
−8.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+37.3%
59
−37.3%
Valorant 140−150
+60.9%
92
−60.9%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+500%
8
−500%
Dota 2 82
+28.1%
64
−28.1%
Elden Ring 44
+25.7%
35−40
−25.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 82
+28.1%
64
−28.1%
Metro Exodus 32
−40.6%
45
+40.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+22.5%
120−130
−22.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 82
+28.1%
64
−28.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+23.3%
40−45
−23.3%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+26.3%
35−40
−26.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
+88.9%
9
−88.9%
Dota 2 115
+0%
115
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+25.5%
55−60
−25.5%
Fortnite 65−70
+26.9%
50−55
−26.9%
Forza Horizon 4 67
+26.4%
53
−26.4%
Valorant 75−80
+31.7%
60−65
−31.7%

This is how RTX 3060 and RTX 4050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3060 is 28% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3060 is 53% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3060 is 61% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3060 is 500% faster.
  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4050 Mobile is 41% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3060 is ahead in 56 tests (89%)
  • RTX 4050 Mobile is ahead in 4 tests (6%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 44.43 37.51
Recency 12 January 2021 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 50 Watt

RTX 3060 has a 18.4% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 4050 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 240% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3060 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3060 is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 29512 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 2895 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.