GeForce G 103M vs RTX 3060

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3060 with GeForce G 103M, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3060
2021, $329
12 GB GDDR6, 170 Watt
40.67
+27013%

RTX 3060 outperforms G 103M by a whopping 27013% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1151491
Place by popularity4not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation58.47no data
Power efficiency18.42no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)G9x (2007−2010)
GPU code nameGA106G98
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date12 January 2021 (5 years ago)1 September 2009 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35848
Core clock speed1320 MHz640 MHz
Boost clock speed1777 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Wattno data
Texture fill rate199.0no data
Floating-point processing power12.74 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48no data
TMUs112no data
Tensor Cores112no data
Ray Tracing Cores28no data
L1 Cache3.5 MBno data
L2 Cache3 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length242 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR2
Maximum RAM amount12 GB512 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1875 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth360.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4ano data
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)10.0
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 3060 40.67
+27013%
G 103M 0.15

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3060 16951
+27240%
Samples: 2045
G 103M 62
Samples: 117

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 3060 81033
+22040%
G 103M 366

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD108-0−1
1440p61-0−1
4K41-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.05no data
1440p5.39no data
4K8.02no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 220−230 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 79 0−1
Resident Evil 4 Remake 110−120 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 130−140 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 220−230 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 78 0−1
Far Cry 5 146 0−1
Fortnite 170−180 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+5167%
3−4
−5167%
Forza Horizon 5 124 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+2171%
7−8
−2171%
Valorant 230−240
+879%
24−27
−879%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 130−140 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 220−230 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+2436%
10−12
−2436%
Cyberpunk 2077 75 0−1
Dota 2 156
+1850%
8−9
−1850%
Far Cry 5 135 0−1
Fortnite 170−180 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+5167%
3−4
−5167%
Forza Horizon 5 110 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 141 0−1
Metro Exodus 81 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+2171%
7−8
−2171%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 179
+3480%
5−6
−3480%
Valorant 230−240
+879%
24−27
−879%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 64 0−1
Dota 2 147
+1738%
8−9
−1738%
Far Cry 5 127 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+5167%
3−4
−5167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+2171%
7−8
−2171%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 87
+1640%
5−6
−1640%
Valorant 230−240
+879%
24−27
−879%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 170−180 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+3433%
3−4
−3433%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 280−290
+28800%
1−2
−28800%
Grand Theft Auto V 81 0−1
Metro Exodus 50 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+8650%
2−3
−8650%
Valorant 260−270 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 39 0−1
Far Cry 5 94 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+11800%
1−2
−11800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+7100%
1−2
−7100%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 110−120 0−1

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 82
+486%
14−16
−486%
Metro Exodus 32 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65 0−1
Valorant 250−260
+24900%
1−2
−24900%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 45−50 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 18 0−1
Dota 2 115 0−1
Far Cry 5 48 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 80−85 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+5700%
1−2
−5700%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+2650%
2−3
−2650%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3060 is 24900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 3060 surpassed G 103M in all 22 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 40.67 0.15
Recency 12 January 2021 1 September 2009
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 8 nm 65 nm

RTX 3060 has a 27013% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 713% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3060 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce G 103M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3060 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce G 103M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 38109 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 36 votes

Rate GeForce G 103M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3060 or GeForce G 103M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.