FirePro D700 vs GeForce RTX 3060

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3060 with FirePro D700, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3060
2021
12 GB GDDR6, 170 Watt
41.46
+216%

RTX 3060 outperforms D700 by a whopping 216% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking83376
Place by popularity5not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation70.18no data
Power efficiency17.983.53
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameGA106Tahiti
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date12 January 2021 (4 years ago)18 January 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35842048
Core clock speed1320 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed1777 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,000 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt274 Watt
Texture fill rate199.0108.8
Floating-point processing power12.74 TFLOPS3.482 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs112128
Tensor Cores112no data
Ray Tracing Cores28no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length242 mm279 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount12 GB6 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1875 MHz1370 MHz
Memory bandwidth360.0 GB/s263.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.75.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA8.6-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120
+243%
35−40
−243%
1440p71
+238%
21−24
−238%
4K48
+243%
14−16
−243%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.74no data
1440p4.63no data
4K6.85no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+220%
30−33
−220%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+229%
24−27
−229%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+217%
35−40
−217%
Counter-Strike 2 97
+223%
30−33
−223%
Cyberpunk 2077 77
+221%
24−27
−221%
Forza Horizon 4 226
+223%
70−75
−223%
Forza Horizon 5 124
+254%
35−40
−254%
Metro Exodus 120
+243%
35−40
−243%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+254%
24−27
−254%
Valorant 180−190
+227%
55−60
−227%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+217%
35−40
−217%
Counter-Strike 2 83
+246%
24−27
−246%
Cyberpunk 2077 72
+243%
21−24
−243%
Dota 2 146
+224%
45−50
−224%
Far Cry 5 105
+250%
30−33
−250%
Fortnite 180−190
+240%
55−60
−240%
Forza Horizon 4 180
+227%
55−60
−227%
Forza Horizon 5 96
+220%
30−33
−220%
Grand Theft Auto V 141
+253%
40−45
−253%
Metro Exodus 87
+222%
27−30
−222%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+222%
65−70
−222%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+254%
24−27
−254%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160−170
+224%
50−55
−224%
Valorant 180−190
+227%
55−60
−227%
World of Tanks 270−280
+228%
85−90
−228%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+217%
35−40
−217%
Counter-Strike 2 72
+243%
21−24
−243%
Cyberpunk 2077 60
+233%
18−20
−233%
Dota 2 147
+227%
45−50
−227%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+247%
30−33
−247%
Forza Horizon 4 154
+242%
45−50
−242%
Forza Horizon 5 79
+229%
24−27
−229%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+222%
65−70
−222%
Valorant 180−190
+227%
55−60
−227%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 81
+238%
24−27
−238%
Grand Theft Auto V 81
+238%
24−27
−238%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+218%
55−60
−218%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+229%
14−16
−229%
World of Tanks 280−290
+232%
85−90
−232%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+225%
24−27
−225%
Cyberpunk 2077 37
+270%
10−11
−270%
Far Cry 5 140−150
+218%
45−50
−218%
Forza Horizon 4 115
+229%
35−40
−229%
Forza Horizon 5 62
+244%
18−20
−244%
Metro Exodus 89
+230%
27−30
−230%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+238%
24−27
−238%
Valorant 140−150
+229%
45−50
−229%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Dota 2 82
+242%
24−27
−242%
Grand Theft Auto V 82
+242%
24−27
−242%
Metro Exodus 32
+220%
10−11
−220%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+227%
45−50
−227%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+233%
9−10
−233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 82
+242%
24−27
−242%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+231%
16−18
−231%
Counter-Strike 2 9
+350%
2−3
−350%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
+240%
5−6
−240%
Dota 2 115
+229%
35−40
−229%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+229%
21−24
−229%
Fortnite 65−70
+267%
18−20
−267%
Forza Horizon 4 67
+219%
21−24
−219%
Forza Horizon 5 36
+260%
10−11
−260%
Valorant 75−80
+229%
24−27
−229%

This is how RTX 3060 and FirePro D700 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3060 is 243% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3060 is 238% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3060 is 243% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 41.46 13.11
Recency 12 January 2021 18 January 2014
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 274 Watt

RTX 3060 has a 216.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 61.2% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3060 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro D700 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3060 is a desktop card while FirePro D700 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
AMD FirePro D700
FirePro D700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 29947 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 38 votes

Rate FirePro D700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.