RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile vs GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
3050 4 GB 3050 6 GB 3050 8 GB 3050 8 GB GA107 3050 OEM 3060 3060 8 GB 3060 8 GB GA104 3060 12 GB GA104 3060 3840SP 3060 GA104 3060 GDDR6X 3060 Ti 3060 Ti GA103 3060 Ti GDDR6X 3070 3070 16 GB 3070 Ti 3070 Ti 8 GB GA102 3070 Ti GA102 3070 TiM 3080 3080 12 GB 3080 Ti 3080 Ti 20 GB 3090 3090 Ti
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
1000 Blackwell Mobile 2000 Blackwell Embedded 2000 Blackwell Mobile 3000 Blackwell Mobile 4000 Blackwell Embedded 4000 Blackwell Mobile 5000 Blackwell Embedded 5000 Blackwell Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 OEM with RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3050 OEM
2022
8 GB GDDR6, 130 Watt
28.09

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile outperforms RTX 3050 OEM by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RTX 3050 OEM RTX 3050 OEM
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking225150
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.8261.77
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameGA106GB206
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date4 January 2022 (3 years ago)19 March 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25603328
Core clock speed1515 MHz952 MHz
Boost clock speed1755 MHz1657 MHz
Number of transistors12,000 million21,900 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate140.4172.3
Floating-point processing power8.986 TFLOPS11.03 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs80104
Tensor Cores80104
Ray Tracing Cores2026
L1 Cache2.5 MB3.3 MB
L2 Cache2 MB32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Length242 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA8.612.0
DLSS++

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110
−29%
129
+29%
1440p55−60
−27.3%
70
+27.3%
4K60−65
−35%
81
+35%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 146
+0%
146
+0%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 93
+0%
93
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

This is how RTX 3050 OEM and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is 29% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is 27% faster in 1440p
  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is 35% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 28.09 35.71
Recency 4 January 2022 19 March 2025
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 45 Watt

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile has a 27.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 60% more advanced lithography process, and 188.9% lower power consumption.

The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is a desktop graphics card while RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX 3050 OEM GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
vs
RX 7400 Radeon RX 7400
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
vs
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 3050 OEM GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
vs
Arc A580 Arc A580
RX 7800 XT AMD RX 7800 XT
vs
RTX A4000H A4000H
RX 7800 XT AMD RX 7800 XT
vs
Instinct MI200 MI200
RTX 4060 Ti Mobile 4060 Ti Mobile
vs
RX 6500 6500
RTX 3050 OEM GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
vs
RTX 3070 Ti GA102 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GA102
RTX 3050 OEM GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
vs
RTX 4080 Ti Mobile GeForce RTX 4080 Ti Mobile
Arc A380 Arc A380
vs
PRO W6300 W6300
Arc A380 Arc A380
vs
L4
Arc A770 Arc A770
vs
Data Center GPU Max 1350 Max 1350
GTX 1630 NVIDIA GTX 1630
vs
Apple M4 16-core GPU core GPU
GTX 1630 NVIDIA GTX 1630
vs
Apple M4 8-core GPU core GPU

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 207 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3050 OEM or RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.