Arc 7-Cores iGPU vs GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 OEM with Arc 7-Cores iGPU, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3050 OEM
2022
8 GB GDDR6, 130 Watt
31.12
+78.5%

RTX 3050 OEM outperforms Arc 7-Cores iGPU by an impressive 79% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking164292
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2022)Xe LPG
GPU code nameGA106Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date4 January 2022 (2 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25607
Boost clock speed1755 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors12,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Wattno data
Texture fill rate140.4no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Arc 7-Cores iGPU compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Length242 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed14 GB/sno data
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4ano data
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3no data
CUDA8.6no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60−65
+76.5%
34
−76.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+71.4%
35−40
−71.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55
+72.4%
27−30
−72.4%
Battlefield 5 100−105
+75.4%
55−60
−75.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+71.4%
35−40
−71.4%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+71.1%
38
−71.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+70.2%
45−50
−70.2%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+72.8%
80−85
−72.8%
Hitman 3 60−65
+76.5%
30−35
−76.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+73.9%
65−70
−73.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+77.1%
45−50
−77.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 95−100
+69.6%
55−60
−69.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
+75.9%
50−55
−75.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+71.4%
35−40
−71.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55
+72.4%
27−30
−72.4%
Battlefield 5 100−105
+75.4%
55−60
−75.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+71.4%
35−40
−71.4%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+76.5%
34
−76.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+70.2%
45−50
−70.2%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+72.8%
80−85
−72.8%
Hitman 3 60−65
+76.5%
30−35
−76.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+73.9%
65−70
−73.9%
Metro Exodus 100−105
+72.4%
55−60
−72.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+77.1%
45−50
−77.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 95−100
+69.6%
55−60
−69.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
+73.1%
52
−73.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
+75.9%
50−55
−75.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+71.4%
35−40
−71.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55
+72.4%
27−30
−72.4%
Battlefield 5 100−105
+75.4%
55−60
−75.4%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+71.4%
35
−71.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+70.2%
45−50
−70.2%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+72.8%
80−85
−72.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+59.1%
22
−59.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
+75.9%
50−55
−75.9%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+59.1%
21−24
−59.1%
Hitman 3 35−40
+66.7%
21−24
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+71.4%
35−40
−71.4%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+71.9%
30−35
−71.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+72.4%
27−30
−72.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+76.5%
30−35
−76.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+60%
14−16
−60%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+76.5%
30−35
−76.5%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+72.4%
27−30
−72.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+76.5%
30−35
−76.5%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+76.5%
30−35
−76.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+57.9%
18−20
−57.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Hitman 3 21−24
+61.5%
12−14
−61.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
+57.9%
18−20
−57.9%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+76.5%
16−18
−76.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+60%
14−16
−60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+76.5%
16−18
−76.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Battlefield 5 30−33
+76.5%
16−18
−76.5%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+61.5%
12−14
−61.5%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+66.7%
24−27
−66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%

This is how RTX 3050 OEM and Arc 7-Cores iGPU compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 OEM is 76% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 31.12 17.43
Recency 4 January 2022 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc 7-Cores iGPU in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is a desktop card while Arc 7-Cores iGPU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU
Arc 7-Cores iGPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 139 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 6 votes

Rate Arc 7-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.