ATI Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking271not rated
Place by popularity82not in top-100
Power efficiency29.37no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)R300 (2003−2008)
GPU code nameGN20-P0-R 6 GBR350
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2023 (2 years ago)1 March 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560no data
Core clock speed1237 MHz380 MHz
Boost clock speed1492 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data117 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)47 Watt
Texture fill rateno data3.040
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount6 GB128 MB
Memory bus width96 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz340 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data21.76 GB/s
Shared memory-no data
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_29.0 (9_0)
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2023 1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 8 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 47 Watt

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile has an age advantage of 19 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1775% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9800 PRO 256-bit, on the other hand, has 27.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile and Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
ATI Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit
Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1038 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile or Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.