ATI Radeon 9800 PRO 128-bit vs Quadro 3000M X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)R300 (2003−2008)
GPU code nameEXMF104R350
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date22 February 2011 (14 years ago)1 March 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores240 ×2no data
Core clock speed450 MHz380 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt47 Watt
Texture fill rate18.00 ×23.040
Floating-point processing power0.432 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs32 ×28
TMUs40 ×28
L1 Cache320 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB ×2128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit ×2128 Bit
Memory clock speed625 MHz300 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s ×29.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 February 2011 1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 47 Watt

3000M X2 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9800 PRO 128-bit, on the other hand, has 219.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 3000M X2 and Radeon 9800 PRO 128-bit. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro 3000M X2 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon 9800 PRO 128-bit is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 3000M X2
Quadro 3000M X2
ATI Radeon 9800 PRO 128-bit
Radeon 9800 PRO 128-bit

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro 3000M X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO 128-bit on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 3000M X2 or Radeon 9800 PRO 128-bit, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.