Tesla M10 vs GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile with Tesla M10, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 60 Watt
22.78
+206%

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile outperforms Tesla M10 by a whopping 206% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking257554
Place by popularity54not in top-100
Power efficiency27.292.38
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameGN20-P0GM107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)18 May 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048640 ×4
Core clock speed1238 MHz1033 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1306 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)225 Watt
Texture fill rateno data52.24 ×4
Floating-point processing powerno data1.672 TFLOPS ×4
ROPsno data16 ×4
TMUsno data40 ×4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB ×4
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed12000 MHz1300 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data83.2 GB/s ×4
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-5.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD62
+244%
18−21
−244%
1440p43
+207%
14−16
−207%
4K26
+225%
8−9
−225%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 170
+209%
55−60
−209%
Cyberpunk 2077 66
+214%
21−24
−214%
Hogwarts Legacy 54
+238%
16−18
−238%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 93
+210%
30−33
−210%
Counter-Strike 2 125
+213%
40−45
−213%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+225%
16−18
−225%
Far Cry 5 68
+224%
21−24
−224%
Fortnite 110−120
+226%
35−40
−226%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+237%
27−30
−237%
Forza Horizon 5 87
+222%
27−30
−222%
Hogwarts Legacy 41
+242%
12−14
−242%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+226%
27−30
−226%
Valorant 160−170
+220%
50−55
−220%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 89
+230%
27−30
−230%
Counter-Strike 2 36
+260%
10−11
−260%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+214%
80−85
−214%
Cyberpunk 2077 41
+242%
12−14
−242%
Dota 2 118
+237%
35−40
−237%
Far Cry 5 64
+256%
18−20
−256%
Fortnite 110−120
+226%
35−40
−226%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+237%
27−30
−237%
Forza Horizon 5 77
+221%
24−27
−221%
Grand Theft Auto V 86
+219%
27−30
−219%
Hogwarts Legacy 31
+210%
10−11
−210%
Metro Exodus 49
+206%
16−18
−206%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+226%
27−30
−226%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 81
+238%
24−27
−238%
Valorant 160−170
+220%
50−55
−220%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 83
+207%
27−30
−207%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+240%
10−11
−240%
Dota 2 112
+220%
35−40
−220%
Far Cry 5 61
+239%
18−20
−239%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+237%
27−30
−237%
Hogwarts Legacy 19
+217%
6−7
−217%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+226%
27−30
−226%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+229%
14−16
−229%
Valorant 160−170
+220%
50−55
−220%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+226%
35−40
−226%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+206%
16−18
−206%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+222%
50−55
−222%
Grand Theft Auto V 48
+243%
14−16
−243%
Metro Exodus 29
+222%
9−10
−222%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+218%
55−60
−218%
Valorant 190−200
+232%
60−65
−232%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 66
+214%
21−24
−214%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+260%
5−6
−260%
Far Cry 5 49
+206%
16−18
−206%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+222%
18−20
−222%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+213%
8−9
−213%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+217%
12−14
−217%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
+238%
16−18
−238%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+214%
7−8
−214%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+214%
14−16
−214%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Metro Exodus 17
+240%
5−6
−240%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
+222%
9−10
−222%
Valorant 130−140
+230%
40−45
−230%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35
+250%
10−11
−250%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+214%
7−8
−214%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+500%
1−2
−500%
Dota 2 62
+244%
18−20
−244%
Far Cry 5 19
+217%
6−7
−217%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+233%
12−14
−233%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%

This is how RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and Tesla M10 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 244% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 207% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 225% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.78 7.44
Recency 11 May 2021 18 May 2016
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 225 Watt

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile has a 206.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 275% lower power consumption.

Tesla M10, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Tesla M10 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is a notebook card while Tesla M10 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
NVIDIA Tesla M10
Tesla M10

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1562 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 16 votes

Rate Tesla M10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile or Tesla M10, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.