Tesla M10 vs GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile with Tesla M10, including specs and performance data.
RTX 3050 4GB Mobile outperforms Tesla M10 by a whopping 206% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 265 | 560 |
| Place by popularity | 54 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 27.77 | 2.42 |
| Architecture | Ampere (2020−2024) | Maxwell (2014−2017) |
| GPU code name | GN20-P0 | GM107 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 11 May 2021 (4 years ago) | 18 May 2016 (9 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 640 ×4 |
| Core clock speed | 1238 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1306 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP) | 225 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 52.24 ×4 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 1.672 TFLOPS ×4 |
| ROPs | no data | 16 ×4 |
| TMUs | no data | 40 ×4 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB ×4 |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit ×4 |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 83.2 GB/s ×4 |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | no data | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | - | 5.0 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 62
+244%
| 18−21
−244%
|
| 1440p | 43
+207%
| 14−16
−207%
|
| 4K | 26
+225%
| 8−9
−225%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 170
+209%
|
55−60
−209%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 66
+214%
|
21−24
−214%
|
| Dead Island 2 | 106
+253%
|
30−33
−253%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 93
+210%
|
30−33
−210%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 125
+213%
|
40−45
−213%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 52
+225%
|
16−18
−225%
|
| Dead Island 2 | 90
+233%
|
27−30
−233%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 68
+224%
|
21−24
−224%
|
| Fortnite | 110−120
+226%
|
35−40
−226%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 90−95
+237%
|
27−30
−237%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 87
+222%
|
27−30
−222%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 85−90
+226%
|
27−30
−226%
|
| Valorant | 160−170
+220%
|
50−55
−220%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 89
+230%
|
27−30
−230%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 36
+260%
|
10−11
−260%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 250−260
+215%
|
80−85
−215%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 41
+242%
|
12−14
−242%
|
| Dead Island 2 | 71
+238%
|
21−24
−238%
|
| Dota 2 | 118
+237%
|
35−40
−237%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 64
+256%
|
18−20
−256%
|
| Fortnite | 110−120
+226%
|
35−40
−226%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 90−95
+237%
|
27−30
−237%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 77
+221%
|
24−27
−221%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 86
+219%
|
27−30
−219%
|
| Metro Exodus | 49
+250%
|
14−16
−250%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 85−90
+226%
|
27−30
−226%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 81
+238%
|
24−27
−238%
|
| Valorant | 160−170
+220%
|
50−55
−220%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 83
+207%
|
27−30
−207%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 34
+240%
|
10−11
−240%
|
| Dead Island 2 | 52
+225%
|
16−18
−225%
|
| Dota 2 | 112
+220%
|
35−40
−220%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 61
+239%
|
18−20
−239%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 90−95
+237%
|
27−30
−237%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 85−90
+226%
|
27−30
−226%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 46
+229%
|
14−16
−229%
|
| Valorant | 160−170
+220%
|
50−55
−220%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 110−120
+226%
|
35−40
−226%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50
+250%
|
14−16
−250%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 160−170
+224%
|
50−55
−224%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 48
+243%
|
14−16
−243%
|
| Metro Exodus | 29
+222%
|
9−10
−222%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+216%
|
55−60
−216%
|
| Valorant | 190−200
+232%
|
60−65
−232%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 66
+214%
|
21−24
−214%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18
+260%
|
5−6
−260%
|
| Dead Island 2 | 40−45
+242%
|
12−14
−242%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 49
+250%
|
14−16
−250%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
+222%
|
18−20
−222%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 35−40
+208%
|
12−14
−208%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 50−55
+238%
|
16−18
−238%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
+214%
|
7−8
−214%
|
| Dead Island 2 | 21−24
+214%
|
7−8
−214%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 44
+214%
|
14−16
−214%
|
| Metro Exodus | 17
+240%
|
5−6
−240%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 29
+222%
|
9−10
−222%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
+230%
|
40−45
−230%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 35
+250%
|
10−11
−250%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
+214%
|
7−8
−214%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
| Dead Island 2 | 21−24
+214%
|
7−8
−214%
|
| Dota 2 | 62
+244%
|
18−20
−244%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 19
+217%
|
6−7
−217%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+233%
|
12−14
−233%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 24−27
+243%
|
7−8
−243%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 24−27
+243%
|
7−8
−243%
|
This is how RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and Tesla M10 compete in popular games:
- RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 244% faster in 1080p
- RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 207% faster in 1440p
- RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 225% faster in 4K
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 23.43 | 7.65 |
| Recency | 11 May 2021 | 18 May 2016 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 225 Watt |
RTX 3050 4GB Mobile has a 206.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 275% lower power consumption.
Tesla M10, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.
The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Tesla M10 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is a notebook card while Tesla M10 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
