Tesla C1060 vs GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking286not rated
Place by popularity59not in top-100
Power efficiency28.46no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGN20-P0GT200B
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date11 May 2021 (4 years ago)9 April 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048240
Core clock speed1238 MHz610 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)188 Watt
Texture fill rateno data48.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data80
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data102.4 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_211.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 May 2021 9 April 2009
Chip lithography 8 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 188 Watt

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile has an age advantage of 12 years, a 587.5% more advanced lithography process, and 213.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and Tesla C1060. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Tesla C1060 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
NVIDIA Tesla C1060
Tesla C1060

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1928 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 10 votes

Rate Tesla C1060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile or Tesla C1060, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.