ATI FireGL X3-256 vs GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking286not rated
Place by popularity59not in top-100
Power efficiency28.46no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameGN20-P0R420
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date11 May 2021 (4 years ago)3 August 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,099

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speed1238 MHz491 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data160 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)57 Watt
Texture fill rateno data5.892
ROPsno data12
TMUsno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz454 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data29.06 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_29.0b (9_2)
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 May 2021 3 August 2004
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 8 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 57 Watt

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile has an age advantage of 16 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

ATI FireGL X3-256, on the other hand, has 5.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and FireGL X3-256. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is a notebook graphics card while FireGL X3-256 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
ATI FireGL X3-256
FireGL X3-256

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1913 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate FireGL X3-256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile or FireGL X3-256, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.