Radeon HD 8210 vs GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and Radeon HD 8210, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 60 Watt
24.49
+4898%

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile outperforms HD 8210 by a whopping 4898% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2261236
Place by popularity74not in top-100
Power efficiency27.984.20
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameGN20-P0Kalindi
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)31 January 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048128
Core clock speed1238 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)8 Watt
Texture fill rateno data2.400
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0768 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed12000 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 24.49
+4898%
HD 8210 0.49

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 15712
+4474%
HD 8210 344

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 43216
+4292%
HD 8210 984

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 11949
+5164%
HD 8210 227

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 65252
+3326%
HD 8210 1905

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 480364
+1695%
HD 8210 26764

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD63
+1160%
5
−1160%
1440p450−1
4K260−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 66
+3200%
2−3
−3200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+1733%
3−4
−1733%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 58
+5700%
1−2
−5700%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+8100%
1−2
−8100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+2450%
2−3
−2450%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+2500%
2−3
−2500%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+5600%
1−2
−5600%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+6400%
1−2
−6400%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+7150%
2−3
−7150%
Hitman 3 57
+1325%
4−5
−1325%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+1338%
8−9
−1338%
Metro Exodus 126
+6200%
2−3
−6200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 87
+8600%
1−2
−8600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
+2000%
4−5
−2000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 186
+564%
27−30
−564%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+1733%
3−4
−1733%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 32 0−1
Battlefield 5 80−85
+8100%
1−2
−8100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+2450%
2−3
−2450%
Cyberpunk 2077 41
+1950%
2−3
−1950%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+5600%
1−2
−5600%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+6400%
1−2
−6400%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+7150%
2−3
−7150%
Hitman 3 55
+1275%
4−5
−1275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+1338%
8−9
−1338%
Metro Exodus 95
+9400%
1−2
−9400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 63
+6200%
1−2
−6200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 94
+2250%
4−5
−2250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+500%
9−10
−500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 180
+543%
27−30
−543%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+1733%
3−4
−1733%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+2450%
2−3
−2450%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+1600%
2−3
−1600%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+5600%
1−2
−5600%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+7150%
2−3
−7150%
Hitman 3 51
+1175%
4−5
−1175%
Horizon Zero Dawn 74
+825%
8−9
−825%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 81
+1925%
4−5
−1925%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+411%
9−10
−411%
Watch Dogs: Legion 26
−7.7%
27−30
+7.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 72
+7100%
1−2
−7100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 22 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 18 0−1
Far Cry 5 27−30 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+7050%
2−3
−7050%
Hitman 3 37
+517%
6−7
−517%
Horizon Zero Dawn 59
+2850%
2−3
−2850%
Metro Exodus 52
+5100%
1−2
−5100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 56
+5500%
1−2
−5500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 166
+5433%
3−4
−5433%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 53
+2550%
2−3
−2550%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20 0−1
Hitman 3 15 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+6300%
2−3
−6300%
Metro Exodus 37 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 6 0−1
Far Cry 5 14−16 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 30−35 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 34 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 25
+1150%
2−3
−1150%

This is how RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and HD 8210 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 1160% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 3200% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 8210 is 8% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is ahead in 28 tests (97%)
  • HD 8210 is ahead in 1 test (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.49 0.49
Recency 11 May 2021 31 January 2014
Chip lithography 8 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 8 Watt

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile has a 4898% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

HD 8210, on the other hand, has 650% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8210 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
AMD Radeon HD 8210
Radeon HD 8210

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1311 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 98 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.