Radeon HD 6310 vs GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and Radeon HD 6310, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 60 Watt
21.12
+7722%

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile outperforms HD 6310 by a whopping 7722% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2371328
Place by popularity59not in top-100
Power efficiency27.801.18
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGN20-P0Loveland
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)9 November 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204880
Core clock speed1238 MHz276 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data450 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)18 Watt
Texture fill rateno data2.208
Floating-point processing powerno data0.04416 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed12000 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_211.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 21.12
+7722%
HD 6310 0.27

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 15712
+6160%
HD 6310 251

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 43216
+6154%
HD 6310 691

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD620−1
1440p430−1
4K26-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 71
+3450%
2−3
−3450%
Counter-Strike 2 170
+8400%
2−3
−8400%
Cyberpunk 2077 66
+6500%
1−2
−6500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 54
+2600%
2−3
−2600%
Battlefield 5 93
+9200%
1−2
−9200%
Counter-Strike 2 125
+12400%
1−2
−12400%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+5100%
1−2
−5100%
Far Cry 5 68 0−1
Fortnite 110−120
+11400%
1−2
−11400%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+2967%
3−4
−2967%
Forza Horizon 5 87
+8600%
1−2
−8600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+1171%
7−8
−1171%
Valorant 160−170
+519%
24−27
−519%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 32
+1500%
2−3
−1500%
Battlefield 5 89
+8800%
1−2
−8800%
Counter-Strike 2 36 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+1838%
12−14
−1838%
Cyberpunk 2077 41
+4000%
1−2
−4000%
Dota 2 118
+1080%
10−11
−1080%
Far Cry 5 64 0−1
Fortnite 110−120
+11400%
1−2
−11400%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+2967%
3−4
−2967%
Forza Horizon 5 77 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 86
+8500%
1−2
−8500%
Metro Exodus 49 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+1171%
7−8
−1171%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 81
+1925%
4−5
−1925%
Valorant 160−170
+519%
24−27
−519%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 83
+8200%
1−2
−8200%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+3300%
1−2
−3300%
Dota 2 112
+1020%
10−11
−1020%
Far Cry 5 61 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+2967%
3−4
−2967%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+1171%
7−8
−1171%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+1050%
4−5
−1050%
Valorant 160−170
+519%
24−27
−519%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+11400%
1−2
−11400%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 50−55 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+8050%
2−3
−8050%
Grand Theft Auto V 48 0−1
Metro Exodus 29 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+5700%
3−4
−5700%
Valorant 200−210
+9900%
2−3
−9900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 66 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 18 0−1
Far Cry 5 49 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+5800%
1−2
−5800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60 0−1

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 18−20 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 21−24 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+193%
14−16
−193%
Metro Exodus 17 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29 0−1
Valorant 130−140
+6600%
2−3
−6600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 21−24 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 6 0−1
Dota 2 62 0−1
Far Cry 5 19
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+1100%
2−3
−1100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+1150%
2−3
−1150%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 6600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 3050 4GB Mobile surpassed HD 6310 in all 28 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.12 0.27
Recency 11 May 2021 9 November 2010
Chip lithography 8 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 18 Watt

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile has a 7722.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

HD 6310, on the other hand, has 233.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6310 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
AMD Radeon HD 6310
Radeon HD 6310

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1489 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 269 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile or Radeon HD 6310, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.