Radeon 630 vs GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and Radeon 630, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 60 Watt
23.99
+525%

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile outperforms 630 by a whopping 525% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking233709
Place by popularity56not in top-100
Power efficiency28.085.39
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGN20-P0Polaris 23
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)13 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048512
Core clock speed1238 MHz1082 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1218 MHz
Number of transistorsno data2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data38.98
Floating-point processing powerno data1.247 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD64
+540%
10−12
−540%
1440p47
+571%
7−8
−571%
4K30
+650%
4−5
−650%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 71
+689%
9−10
−689%
Counter-Strike 2 42
+320%
10−11
−320%
Cyberpunk 2077 66
+725%
8−9
−725%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 54
+500%
9−10
−500%
Battlefield 5 93
+564%
14−16
−564%
Counter-Strike 2 38
+280%
10−11
−280%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+550%
8−9
−550%
Far Cry 5 68
+656%
9−10
−656%
Fortnite 110−120
+448%
21−24
−448%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+441%
16−18
−441%
Forza Horizon 5 80
+1043%
7−8
−1043%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+493%
14−16
−493%
Valorant 160−170
+210%
50−55
−210%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 32
+256%
9−10
−256%
Battlefield 5 89
+536%
14−16
−536%
Counter-Strike 2 30
+200%
10−11
−200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+276%
65−70
−276%
Cyberpunk 2077 41
+413%
8−9
−413%
Dota 2 118
+247%
30−35
−247%
Far Cry 5 64
+611%
9−10
−611%
Fortnite 110−120
+448%
21−24
−448%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+441%
16−18
−441%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+829%
7−8
−829%
Grand Theft Auto V 86
+617%
12−14
−617%
Metro Exodus 49
+600%
7−8
−600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+493%
14−16
−493%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 81
+636%
10−12
−636%
Valorant 160−170
+210%
50−55
−210%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 83
+493%
14−16
−493%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+350%
10−11
−350%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+325%
8−9
−325%
Dota 2 112
+229%
30−35
−229%
Far Cry 5 61
+578%
9−10
−578%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+441%
16−18
−441%
Forza Horizon 5 55
+686%
7−8
−686%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+493%
14−16
−493%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+318%
10−12
−318%
Valorant 160−170
+210%
50−55
−210%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+448%
21−24
−448%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+482%
27−30
−482%
Grand Theft Auto V 48
+1500%
3−4
−1500%
Metro Exodus 29
+1350%
2−3
−1350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+548%
27−30
−548%
Valorant 200−210
+413%
35−40
−413%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 66
+560%
10−11
−560%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+360%
5−6
−360%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+500%
3−4
−500%
Far Cry 5 49
+600%
7−8
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+556%
9−10
−556%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+720%
5−6
−720%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+533%
6−7
−533%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+686%
7−8
−686%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 18−20
+500%
3−4
−500%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+175%
16−18
−175%
Metro Exodus 17
+750%
2−3
−750%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
+625%
4−5
−625%
Valorant 130−140
+644%
18−20
−644%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35
+600%
5−6
−600%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+500%
1−2
−500%
Dota 2 62
+417%
12−14
−417%
Far Cry 5 19
+375%
4−5
−375%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+900%
4−5
−900%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+500%
4−5
−500%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+525%
4−5
−525%

This is how RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and Radeon 630 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 540% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 571% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 650% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 2100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 3050 4GB Mobile surpassed Radeon 630 in all 61 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.99 3.84
Recency 11 May 2021 13 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 50 Watt

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile has a 524.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

Radeon 630, on the other hand, has 20% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 630 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
AMD Radeon 630
Radeon 630

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1451 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 33 votes

Rate Radeon 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile or Radeon 630, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.