RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server vs GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile with RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 60 Watt
21.05

PRO 6000 Blackwell Server outperforms 3050 4GB Mobile by a whopping 349% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2825
Place by popularity46not in top-100
Power efficiency28.2512.70
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGN20-P0GB202
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date11 May 2021 (4 years ago)18 March 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204824064
Core clock speed1238 MHz1590 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz2617 MHz
Number of transistorsno data92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)600 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1,968.0
Floating-point processing powerno data126 TFLOPS
ROPsno data192
TMUsno data752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Coresno data188
L1 Cacheno data23.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount4 GB96 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.79 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD62
−335%
270−280
+335%
1440p43
−342%
190−200
+342%
4K26
−323%
110−120
+323%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 170
−341%
750−800
+341%
Cyberpunk 2077 66
−339%
290−300
+339%
Hogwarts Legacy 54
−344%
240−250
+344%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 93
−330%
400−450
+330%
Counter-Strike 2 125
−340%
550−600
+340%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
−342%
230−240
+342%
Far Cry 5 68
−341%
300−310
+341%
Fortnite 110−120
−339%
500−550
+339%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−344%
400−450
+344%
Forza Horizon 5 87
−302%
350−400
+302%
Hogwarts Legacy 41
−339%
180−190
+339%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
−298%
350−400
+298%
Valorant 160−170
−338%
700−750
+338%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 89
−349%
400−450
+349%
Counter-Strike 2 36
−344%
160−170
+344%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
−338%
1100−1150
+338%
Cyberpunk 2077 41
−339%
180−190
+339%
Dota 2 118
−324%
500−550
+324%
Far Cry 5 64
−338%
280−290
+338%
Fortnite 110−120
−339%
500−550
+339%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−344%
400−450
+344%
Forza Horizon 5 77
−290%
300−310
+290%
Grand Theft Auto V 86
−307%
350−400
+307%
Hogwarts Legacy 31
−319%
130−140
+319%
Metro Exodus 49
−349%
220−230
+349%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
−298%
350−400
+298%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 81
−332%
350−400
+332%
Valorant 160−170
−338%
700−750
+338%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 83
−322%
350−400
+322%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
−341%
150−160
+341%
Dota 2 112
−346%
500−550
+346%
Far Cry 5 61
−343%
270−280
+343%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−344%
400−450
+344%
Hogwarts Legacy 19
−347%
85−90
+347%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
−298%
350−400
+298%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
−335%
200−210
+335%
Valorant 160−170
−338%
700−750
+338%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
−339%
500−550
+339%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−338%
210−220
+338%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
−332%
700−750
+332%
Grand Theft Auto V 48
−338%
210−220
+338%
Metro Exodus 29
−348%
130−140
+348%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−331%
750−800
+331%
Valorant 190−200
−331%
850−900
+331%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 66
−339%
290−300
+339%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
−344%
80−85
+344%
Far Cry 5 49
−349%
220−230
+349%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−348%
260−270
+348%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
−340%
110−120
+340%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−344%
160−170
+344%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 50−55
−344%
240−250
+344%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−332%
95−100
+332%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
−332%
190−200
+332%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
−329%
60−65
+329%
Metro Exodus 17
−341%
75−80
+341%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
−348%
130−140
+348%
Valorant 130−140
−317%
550−600
+317%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35
−329%
150−160
+329%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−332%
95−100
+332%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
−300%
24−27
+300%
Dota 2 62
−335%
270−280
+335%
Far Cry 5 19
−347%
85−90
+347%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−325%
170−180
+325%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
−329%
60−65
+329%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−317%
100−105
+317%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
−317%
100−105
+317%

This is how RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is 335% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is 342% faster in 1440p
  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is 323% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.05 94.61
Recency 11 May 2021 18 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 96 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 600 Watt

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile has 900% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server, on the other hand, has a 349.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1815 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 14 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile or RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.