GeForce 9600 GT vs RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile with GeForce 9600 GT, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 60 Watt
24.55
+1880%

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile outperforms 9600 GT by a whopping 1880% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2291042
Place by popularity52not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.06
Power efficiency28.220.90
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGN20-P0G94
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)21 February 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$179

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204864
Core clock speed1238 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data505 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)96 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rateno data20.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.208 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno data16x PCI-E 2.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data57.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataHDTVTwo Dual Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_211.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD63
+2000%
3−4
−2000%
1440p45
+2150%
2−3
−2150%
4K29
+2800%
1−2
−2800%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data59.67
1440pno data89.50
4Kno data179.00

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 42
+2000%
2−3
−2000%
Cyberpunk 2077 66
+2100%
3−4
−2100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+2400%
3−4
−2400%
Counter-Strike 2 40
+1900%
2−3
−1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
+2200%
2−3
−2200%
Forza Horizon 4 115
+2200%
5−6
−2200%
Forza Horizon 5 80
+1900%
4−5
−1900%
Metro Exodus 83
+1975%
4−5
−1975%
Red Dead Redemption 2 87
+2075%
4−5
−2075%
Valorant 133
+2117%
6−7
−2117%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+2400%
3−4
−2400%
Counter-Strike 2 30
+2900%
1−2
−2900%
Cyberpunk 2077 37
+3600%
1−2
−3600%
Dota 2 96
+2300%
4−5
−2300%
Far Cry 5 73
+2333%
3−4
−2333%
Fortnite 120−130
+1967%
6−7
−1967%
Forza Horizon 4 94
+2250%
4−5
−2250%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+2067%
3−4
−2067%
Grand Theft Auto V 86
+2050%
4−5
−2050%
Metro Exodus 57
+2750%
2−3
−2750%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+2114%
7−8
−2114%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+2600%
2−3
−2600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+2533%
3−4
−2533%
Valorant 68
+2167%
3−4
−2167%
World of Tanks 250−260
+2033%
12−14
−2033%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+2400%
3−4
−2400%
Counter-Strike 2 26
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Cyberpunk 2077 31
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
Dota 2 112
+2140%
5−6
−2140%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+2433%
3−4
−2433%
Forza Horizon 4 81
+1925%
4−5
−1925%
Forza Horizon 5 55
+2650%
2−3
−2650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+2114%
7−8
−2114%
Valorant 95−100
+2350%
4−5
−2350%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 48
+2300%
2−3
−2300%
Grand Theft Auto V 48
+2300%
2−3
−2300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+2088%
8−9
−2088%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
World of Tanks 160−170
+1938%
8−9
−1938%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+2350%
2−3
−2350%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+3100%
1−2
−3100%
Cyberpunk 2077 17 0−1
Far Cry 5 70−75
+2267%
3−4
−2267%
Forza Horizon 4 56
+2700%
2−3
−2700%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+3800%
1−2
−3800%
Metro Exodus 52
+2500%
2−3
−2500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+3500%
1−2
−3500%
Valorant 65−70
+2100%
3−4
−2100%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Dota 2 44
+2100%
2−3
−2100%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+2100%
2−3
−2100%
Metro Exodus 17 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+2400%
3−4
−2400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
+2100%
2−3
−2100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Cyberpunk 2077 5 0−1
Dota 2 62
+1967%
3−4
−1967%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+3200%
1−2
−3200%
Fortnite 30−33
+2900%
1−2
−2900%
Forza Horizon 4 34
+3300%
1−2
−3300%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Valorant 30−35
+3100%
1−2
−3100%

This is how RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and 9600 GT compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 2000% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 2150% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 2800% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.55 1.24
Recency 11 May 2021 21 February 2008
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 8 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 96 Watt

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile has a 1879.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 712.5% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9600 GT in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is a notebook card while GeForce 9600 GT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
GeForce 9600 GT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1420 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 2060 votes

Rate GeForce 9600 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.