Radeon Instinct MI60 vs GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile with Radeon Instinct MI60, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2080 Mobile
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 150 Watt
36.48
+31.1%

RTX 2080 Mobile outperforms MI60 by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking146230
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency18.687.12
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU104BVega 20
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date29 January 2019 (6 years ago)18 November 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores29444096
Core clock speed1380 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speed1590 MHz1800 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million13,230 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate292.6460.8
Floating-point processing power9.362 TFLOPS14.75 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs184256
Tensor Cores368no data
Ray Tracing Cores46no data
L1 Cache2.9 MB1 MB
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB32 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s1,024 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD143
+43%
100−110
−43%
1440p94
+34.3%
70−75
−34.3%
4K65
+44.4%
45−50
−44.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+36.7%
150−160
−36.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+41.7%
60−65
−41.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 85−90
+41.7%
60−65
−41.7%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 132
+32%
100−105
−32%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+36.7%
150−160
−36.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+41.7%
60−65
−41.7%
Escape from Tarkov 121
+34.4%
90−95
−34.4%
Far Cry 5 104
+38.7%
75−80
−38.7%
Fortnite 206
+37.3%
150−160
−37.3%
Forza Horizon 4 147
+33.6%
110−120
−33.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 85−90
+41.7%
60−65
−41.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 243
+35%
180−190
−35%
Valorant 276
+31.4%
210−220
−31.4%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 118
+31.1%
90−95
−31.1%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+36.7%
150−160
−36.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+32.4%
210−220
−32.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+41.7%
60−65
−41.7%
Dota 2 131
+37.9%
95−100
−37.9%
Escape from Tarkov 121
+34.4%
90−95
−34.4%
Far Cry 5 97
+38.6%
70−75
−38.6%
Fortnite 169
+40.8%
120−130
−40.8%
Forza Horizon 4 145
+31.8%
110−120
−31.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 101
+34.7%
75−80
−34.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 85−90
+41.7%
60−65
−41.7%
Metro Exodus 90
+38.5%
65−70
−38.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 214
+33.8%
160−170
−33.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 174
+33.8%
130−140
−33.8%
Valorant 266
+33%
200−210
−33%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 117
+37.6%
85−90
−37.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+41.7%
60−65
−41.7%
Dota 2 125
+31.6%
95−100
−31.6%
Escape from Tarkov 121
+34.4%
90−95
−34.4%
Far Cry 5 96
+37.1%
70−75
−37.1%
Forza Horizon 4 139
+39%
100−105
−39%
Hogwarts Legacy 85−90
+41.7%
60−65
−41.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 174
+33.8%
130−140
−33.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95
+35.7%
70−75
−35.7%
Valorant 205
+36.7%
150−160
−36.7%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 155
+40.9%
110−120
−40.9%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+40%
65−70
−40%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+35.8%
190−200
−35.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+38.2%
55−60
−38.2%
Metro Exodus 55
+37.5%
40−45
−37.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+34.6%
130−140
−34.6%
Valorant 260
+36.8%
190−200
−36.8%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 115
+35.3%
85−90
−35.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+40%
30−33
−40%
Escape from Tarkov 89
+36.9%
65−70
−36.9%
Far Cry 5 82
+36.7%
60−65
−36.7%
Forza Horizon 4 122
+35.6%
90−95
−35.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
+43.3%
30−33
−43.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+36%
50−55
−36%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 124
+37.8%
90−95
−37.8%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+40%
30−33
−40%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+31.7%
60−65
−31.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 35
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65
+44.4%
45−50
−44.4%
Valorant 240
+33.3%
180−190
−33.3%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 68
+36%
50−55
−36%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+40%
30−33
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Dota 2 119
+32.2%
90−95
−32.2%
Escape from Tarkov 49
+40%
35−40
−40%
Far Cry 5 52
+48.6%
35−40
−48.6%
Forza Horizon 4 82
+36.7%
60−65
−36.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 61
+35.6%
45−50
−35.6%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 61
+35.6%
45−50
−35.6%

This is how RTX 2080 Mobile and Instinct MI60 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2080 Mobile is 43% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2080 Mobile is 34% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2080 Mobile is 44% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.48 27.83
Recency 29 January 2019 18 November 2018
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 300 Watt

RTX 2080 Mobile has a 31.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 months, and 100% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI60, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Instinct MI60 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Instinct MI60 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
AMD Radeon Instinct MI60
Radeon Instinct MI60

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 177 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 6 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile or Radeon Instinct MI60, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.