GeForce GTX 295 vs RTX 2080 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile with GeForce GTX 295, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2080 Mobile
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 150 Watt
37.79
+1172%

RTX 2080 Mobile outperforms GTX 295 by a whopping 1172% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking145801
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.13
Power efficiency18.200.74
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameTU104BGT200B
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date29 January 2019 (6 years ago)8 January 2009 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$500

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2944480 ×2
CUDA cores per GPUno data240
Core clock speed1380 MHz576 MHz
Boost clock speed1590 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,600 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt289 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rate292.646.08 ×2
Floating-point processing power9.362 TFLOPS0.5962 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs6428 ×2
TMUs18480 ×2
Tensor Cores368no data
Ray Tracing Cores46no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Heightno data4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1792 MB ×2
Standard memory config per GPUno data896 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit896 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed14000 MHz999 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s223.8 GB/s ×2
Memory interface width per GPUno data448 Bit
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsTwo Dual Link DVIHDMI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
G-SYNC support+-
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)no data128bit
VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.54.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5+
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD142
+1320%
10−12
−1320%
1440p94
+1243%
7−8
−1243%
4K65
+1200%
5−6
−1200%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data50.00
1440pno data71.43
4Kno data100.00

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+1200%
16−18
−1200%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+1317%
6−7
−1317%
Dead Island 2 160−170
+1300%
12−14
−1300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 132
+1220%
10−11
−1220%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+1200%
16−18
−1200%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+1317%
6−7
−1317%
Dead Island 2 160−170
+1300%
12−14
−1300%
Far Cry 5 104
+1200%
8−9
−1200%
Fortnite 206
+1188%
16−18
−1188%
Forza Horizon 4 147
+1370%
10−11
−1370%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+1178%
9−10
−1178%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 243
+1250%
18−20
−1250%
Valorant 276
+1214%
21−24
−1214%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 118
+1211%
9−10
−1211%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+1200%
16−18
−1200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+1224%
21−24
−1224%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+1317%
6−7
−1317%
Dead Island 2 160−170
+1300%
12−14
−1300%
Dota 2 131
+1210%
10−11
−1210%
Far Cry 5 97
+1286%
7−8
−1286%
Fortnite 169
+1308%
12−14
−1308%
Forza Horizon 4 145
+1350%
10−11
−1350%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+1178%
9−10
−1178%
Grand Theft Auto V 101
+1343%
7−8
−1343%
Metro Exodus 90
+1186%
7−8
−1186%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 214
+1238%
16−18
−1238%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 174
+1350%
12−14
−1350%
Valorant 266
+1378%
18−20
−1378%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 117
+1200%
9−10
−1200%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+1317%
6−7
−1317%
Dead Island 2 160−170
+1300%
12−14
−1300%
Dota 2 125
+1289%
9−10
−1289%
Far Cry 5 96
+1271%
7−8
−1271%
Forza Horizon 4 139
+1290%
10−11
−1290%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 174
+1350%
12−14
−1350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95
+1257%
7−8
−1257%
Valorant 205
+1181%
16−18
−1181%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 155
+1192%
12−14
−1192%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+1214%
7−8
−1214%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+1317%
18−20
−1317%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+1380%
5−6
−1380%
Metro Exodus 55
+1275%
4−5
−1275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+1358%
12−14
−1358%
Valorant 260
+1344%
18−20
−1344%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 115
+1178%
9−10
−1178%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+1300%
3−4
−1300%
Dead Island 2 75−80
+1183%
6−7
−1183%
Far Cry 5 82
+1267%
6−7
−1267%
Forza Horizon 4 122
+1256%
9−10
−1256%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+1280%
5−6
−1280%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 124
+1278%
9−10
−1278%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+1333%
3−4
−1333%
Dead Island 2 35−40
+1650%
2−3
−1650%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+1200%
6−7
−1200%
Metro Exodus 35
+1650%
2−3
−1650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65
+1200%
5−6
−1200%
Valorant 240
+1233%
18−20
−1233%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 68
+1260%
5−6
−1260%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+1333%
3−4
−1333%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Dead Island 2 35−40
+1650%
2−3
−1650%
Dota 2 119
+1222%
9−10
−1222%
Far Cry 5 52
+1200%
4−5
−1200%
Forza Horizon 4 82
+1267%
6−7
−1267%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 61
+1425%
4−5
−1425%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 61
+1425%
4−5
−1425%

This is how RTX 2080 Mobile and GTX 295 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2080 Mobile is 1320% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2080 Mobile is 1243% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2080 Mobile is 1200% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.79 2.97
Recency 29 January 2019 8 January 2009
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1792 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 289 Watt

RTX 2080 Mobile has a 1172.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 357.1% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 358.3% more advanced lithography process, and 92.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 295 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 295 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GTX 295

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 151 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 89 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 295 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile or GeForce GTX 295, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.