GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs RTX 2080 Ti

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2080 Ti with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2080 Ti
2018
11 GB GDDR6, 250 Watt
56.35
+179%

RTX 2080 Ti outperforms GTX 1650 Ti Mobile by a whopping 179% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking44269
Place by popularitynot in top-10069
Cost-effectiveness evaluation22.34no data
Power efficiency15.6728.10
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU102TU116
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date20 September 2018 (6 years ago)23 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores43521024
Core clock speed1350 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHz1485 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate420.295.04
Floating-point processing power13.45 TFLOPS3.041 TFLOPS
ROPs8832
TMUs27264
Tensor Cores544no data
Ray Tracing Cores68no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount11 GB4 GB
Memory bus width352 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth616.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.140
CUDA7.57.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2080 Ti 56.35
+179%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.21

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2080 Ti 21739
+179%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 2080 Ti 47166
+256%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 13266

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 2080 Ti 83556
+92%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 43517

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 2080 Ti 20210
+104%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 9930

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 2080 Ti 165122
+153%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 65163

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 2080 Ti 521458
+27.1%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 410191

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD165
+184%
58
−184%
1440p119
+183%
42
−183%
4K89
+230%
27
−230%

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.05no data
1440p8.39no data
4K11.22no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+79.7%
59
−79.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 125
+105%
61
−105%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 107
+118%
49
−118%
Battlefield 5 244
+270%
65−70
−270%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+102%
53
−102%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+130%
46
−130%
Far Cry 5 163
+136%
69
−136%
Far Cry New Dawn 197
+135%
84
−135%
Forza Horizon 4 346
+179%
120−130
−179%
Hitman 3 161
+216%
51
−216%
Horizon Zero Dawn 285
+57.5%
181
−57.5%
Metro Exodus 144
+58.2%
91
−58.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 106
+141%
44
−141%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 216
+222%
65−70
−222%
Watch Dogs: Legion 266
+32.3%
201
−32.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 181
+302%
45−50
−302%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 91
+184%
32
−184%
Battlefield 5 224
+239%
65−70
−239%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+128%
47
−128%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+194%
36
−194%
Far Cry 5 132
+128%
58
−128%
Far Cry New Dawn 152
+158%
59
−158%
Forza Horizon 4 321
+159%
120−130
−159%
Hitman 3 156
+212%
50
−212%
Horizon Zero Dawn 267
+48.3%
180
−48.3%
Metro Exodus 144
+82.3%
79
−82.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+190%
39
−190%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 220−230
+200%
75
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+160%
45−50
−160%
Watch Dogs: Legion 255
+39.3%
183
−39.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 82
+204%
27
−204%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 80
+433%
15
−433%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 103
+232%
31
−232%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+212%
34
−212%
Far Cry 5 91
+133%
39
−133%
Forza Horizon 4 168
+35.5%
120−130
−35.5%
Hitman 3 139
+223%
43
−223%
Horizon Zero Dawn 202
+216%
64
−216%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 220−230
+257%
63
−257%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 135
+246%
39
−246%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90
+309%
22
−309%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 104
+154%
41
−154%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 166
+326%
35−40
−326%
Far Cry New Dawn 112
+195%
38
−195%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 72
+243%
21−24
−243%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 67
+272%
18−20
−272%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 82
+273%
21−24
−273%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+238%
16
−238%
Far Cry 5 84
+223%
26
−223%
Forza Horizon 4 313
+177%
110−120
−177%
Hitman 3 100
+257%
28
−257%
Horizon Zero Dawn 162
+295%
40−45
−295%
Metro Exodus 98
+158%
35−40
−158%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
+263%
40−45
−263%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
+309%
21−24
−309%
Watch Dogs: Legion 251
+109%
120
−109%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 105
+218%
30−35
−218%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 87
+335%
20−22
−335%
Far Cry New Dawn 66
+230%
20
−230%
Hitman 3 59
+269%
16
−269%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130
+210%
42
−210%
Metro Exodus 111
+405%
21−24
−405%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 98
+292%
25
−292%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50
+317%
12−14
−317%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 46
+360%
10−11
−360%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 52
+373%
10−12
−373%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+317%
6
−317%
Far Cry 5 50
+317%
12
−317%
Forza Horizon 4 107
+282%
27−30
−282%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
+265%
21−24
−265%
Watch Dogs: Legion 44
+389%
9−10
−389%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 73
+306%
18−20
−306%

This is how RTX 2080 Ti and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2080 Ti is 184% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2080 Ti is 183% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2080 Ti is 230% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 2080 Ti is 433% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 2080 Ti surpassed GTX 1650 Ti Mobile in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 56.35 20.21
Recency 20 September 2018 23 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 11 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 50 Watt

RTX 2080 Ti has a 178.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 175% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 400% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 4168 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1620 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.