GeForce MX570 A vs RTX 2070

Place in performance ranking	83	323
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	31.17	no data
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	Turing TU106	GA107
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	27 August 2018 (5 years ago)	May 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$499	no data
Current price	$309 (0.6x MSRP)	$1574

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	2048
Core clock speed	1410 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1620 MHz	1155 MHz
Number of transistors	10,800 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	175 Watt	25 Watt
Texture fill rate	233.3	73.92

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	229 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	12 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	96 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data
G-SYNC support	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	7.5	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2070 41.86
+171%

MX570 A 15.43

RTX 2070 outperforms MX570 A by 171% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 2070 16167
+171%

MX570 A 5957

RTX 2070 outperforms MX570 A by 171% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	131 +191%	45−50 −191%
1440p	85 +183%	30−35 −183%
4K	61 +190%	21−24 −190%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

200−210

+170%

70−75
−170%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	270−280 +167%	101 −167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	230−240 +164%	87 −164%
Battlefield 5	400−450 +144%	164 −144%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	300−310 +159%	116 −159%
Cyberpunk 2077	200−210 +170%	70−75 −170%
Far Cry 5	300−310 +142%	124 −142%
Far Cry New Dawn	400−450 +170%	148 −170%
Forza Horizon 4	350−400 +146%	142 −146%
Hitman 3	300−310 +159%	116 −159%
Horizon Zero Dawn	600−650 +160%	231 −160%
Metro Exodus	350−400 +143%	144 −143%
Red Dead Redemption 2	290−300 +164%	110 −164%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	450−500 +169%	160−170 −169%
Watch Dogs: Legion	290−300 +171%	107 −171%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	230−240 +167%	86 −167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	190−200 +160%	73 −160%
Battlefield 5	400−450 +156%	156 −156%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	280−290 +164%	106 −164%
Cyberpunk 2077	200−210 +170%	70−75 −170%
Far Cry 5	270−280 +167%	101 −167%
Far Cry New Dawn	290−300 +169%	108 −169%
Forza Horizon 4	600−650 +164%	227 −164%
Hitman 3	250−260 +169%	93 −169%
Horizon Zero Dawn	650−700 +162%	248 −162%
Metro Exodus	300−310 +146%	122 −146%
Red Dead Redemption 2	270−280 +162%	103 −162%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	450−500 +169%	160−170 −169%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	400−450 +153%	158 −153%
Watch Dogs: Legion	650−700 +166%	244 −166%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	170−180 +166%	64 −166%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	170−180 +162%	65 −162%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	210−220 +169%	78 −169%
Cyberpunk 2077	200−210 +170%	70−75 −170%
Far Cry 5	210−220 +166%	79 −166%
Forza Horizon 4	290−300 +164%	110 −164%
Horizon Zero Dawn	350−400 +152%	139 −152%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	450−500 +169%	160−170 −169%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	230−240 +164%	87 −164%
Watch Dogs: Legion	170−180 +166%	64 −166%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

260−270

+163%

99
−163%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	280−290 +164%	106 −164%
Far Cry New Dawn	350−400 +169%	130 −169%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	140−150 +169%	52 −169%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	130−140 +160%	50 −160%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	200−210 +167%	75 −167%
Cyberpunk 2077	90−95 +165%	30−35 −165%
Far Cry 5	230−240 +161%	88 −161%
Forza Horizon 4	250−260 +169%	93 −169%
Hitman 3	170−180 +166%	64 −166%
Horizon Zero Dawn	280−290 +169%	104 −169%
Metro Exodus	220−230 +168%	82 −168%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	270−280 +162%	100−110 −162%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	160−170 +158%	60−65 −158%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +155%	47 −155%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

220−230

+162%

84
−162%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	140−150 +164%	53 −164%
Far Cry New Dawn	110−120 +150%	44 −150%
Hitman 3	110−120 +168%	41 −168%
Horizon Zero Dawn	140−150 +159%	50−55 −159%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−105 +150%	40 −150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +170%	63 −170%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	95−100 +164%	36 −164%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	80−85 +158%	31 −158%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	85−90 +158%	33 −158%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +167%	14−16 −167%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +158%	31 −158%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +170%	63 −170%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 +162%	61 −162%
Metro Exodus	130−140 +155%	51 −155%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 +159%	27 −159%