UHD Graphics 750 vs GeForce RTX 2070 Super

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2070 Super with UHD Graphics 750, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2070 Super
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 215 Watt
47.26
+953%

RTX 2070 Super outperforms UHD Graphics 750 by a whopping 953% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking61624
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation46.592.10
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameTuring TU104Rocket Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2 July 2019 (4 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data
Current price$261 (0.5x MSRP)$1454

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2070 Super has 2119% better value for money than UHD Graphics 750.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560256
Core clock speed1605 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1770 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)215 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate283.220.80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce RTX 2070 Super and UHD Graphics 750 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed14000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs
HDMI+no data
G-SYNC support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA7.5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2070 Super 47.26
+953%
UHD Graphics 750 4.49

GeForce RTX 2070 Super outperforms UHD Graphics 750 by 953% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 2070 Super 18252
+953%
UHD Graphics 750 1733

GeForce RTX 2070 Super outperforms UHD Graphics 750 by 953% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD132
+1000%
12−14
−1000%
1440p83
+1086%
7−8
−1086%
4K54
+980%
5−6
−980%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 950−1000
+911%
94
−911%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+900%
9−10
−900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+900%
10−12
−900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−105
+900%
10−11
−900%
Cyberpunk 2077 850−900
+912%
84
−912%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+900%
9−10
−900%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
+900%
12−14
−900%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+948%
21−24
−948%
Hitman 3 90−95
+900%
9−10
−900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 250−260
+942%
24−27
−942%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+900%
7−8
−900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+900%
12−14
−900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 160−170
+900%
16−18
−900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 220−230
+948%
21−24
−948%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+900%
9−10
−900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+900%
10−12
−900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−105
+900%
10−11
−900%
Cyberpunk 2077 800−850
+926%
78
−926%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+900%
9−10
−900%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
+900%
12−14
−900%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+948%
21−24
−948%
Hitman 3 90−95
+900%
9−10
−900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 250−260
+942%
24−27
−942%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+900%
7−8
−900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+900%
12−14
−900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 160−170
+900%
16−18
−900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−105
+900%
10−11
−900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 220−230
+948%
21−24
−948%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+900%
9−10
−900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−105
+900%
10−11
−900%
Cyberpunk 2077 750−800
+927%
73
−927%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+900%
9−10
−900%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+948%
21−24
−948%
Horizon Zero Dawn 250−260
+942%
24−27
−942%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 160−170
+900%
16−18
−900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−105
+900%
10−11
−900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 220−230
+948%
21−24
−948%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+900%
12−14
−900%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+900%
8−9
−900%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+900%
6−7
−900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+900%
4−5
−900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 550−600
+938%
53
−938%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
+900%
7−8
−900%
Cyberpunk 2077 450−500
+857%
47
−857%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+900%
7−8
−900%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+900%
7−8
−900%
Hitman 3 90−95
+900%
9−10
−900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−105
+900%
10−11
−900%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1250−1300
+916%
123
−916%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+900%
8−9
−900%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%
Hitman 3 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+900%
4−5
−900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Cyberpunk 2077 240−250
+943%
23
−943%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+900%
4−5
−900%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+900%
6−7
−900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+900%
5−6
−900%

This is how RTX 2070 Super and UHD Graphics 750 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Super is 1000% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2070 Super is 1086% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2070 Super is 980% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 47.26 4.49
Recency 2 July 2019 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 215 Watt 15 Watt

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 750 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2070 Super is a desktop card while UHD Graphics 750 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Intel UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 750

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 4564 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 357 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.