Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce RTX 2070 Super

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2070 Super with RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2070 Super
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 215 Watt
47.40
+73.2%

RTX 2070 Super outperforms Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile by an impressive 73% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking69206
Place by popularity98not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation41.03no data
Power efficiency15.2053.93
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTU104AD107
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date9 July 2019 (5 years ago)26 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602048
Core clock speed1605 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz2025 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)215 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate283.2129.6
Floating-point processing power9.062 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs16064
Tensor Cores32064
Ray Tracing Cores4016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.58.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2070 Super 47.40
+73.2%
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 27.37

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 2070 Super 34964
+72.8%
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 20239

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 2070 Super 89209
+34.6%
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 66297

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 2070 Super 24640
+74.3%
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 14136

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD134
+78.7%
75−80
−78.7%
1440p79
+75.6%
45−50
−75.6%
4K51
+88.9%
27−30
−88.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.72no data
1440p6.32no data
4K9.78no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 117
+80%
65−70
−80%
Cyberpunk 2077 94
+88%
50−55
−88%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 98
+78.2%
55−60
−78.2%
Counter-Strike 2 96
+74.5%
55−60
−74.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 86
+91.1%
45−50
−91.1%
Forza Horizon 4 252
+80%
140−150
−80%
Forza Horizon 5 131
+74.7%
75−80
−74.7%
Metro Exodus 112
+86.7%
60−65
−86.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 122
+74.3%
70−75
−74.3%
Valorant 214
+78.3%
120−130
−78.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 180
+80%
100−105
−80%
Counter-Strike 2 84
+86.7%
45−50
−86.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 76
+90%
40−45
−90%
Dota 2 142
+77.5%
80−85
−77.5%
Far Cry 5 92
+84%
50−55
−84%
Fortnite 168
+76.8%
95−100
−76.8%
Forza Horizon 4 198
+80%
110−120
−80%
Forza Horizon 5 102
+85.5%
55−60
−85.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 145
+81.3%
80−85
−81.3%
Metro Exodus 89
+78%
50−55
−78%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 249
+77.9%
140−150
−77.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 67
+91.4%
35−40
−91.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+81.1%
95−100
−81.1%
Valorant 128
+82.9%
70−75
−82.9%
World of Tanks 270−280
+74.4%
160−170
−74.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85
+88.9%
45−50
−88.9%
Counter-Strike 2 78
+73.3%
45−50
−73.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 69
+97.1%
35−40
−97.1%
Dota 2 129
+84.3%
70−75
−84.3%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+76.7%
60−65
−76.7%
Forza Horizon 4 167
+75.8%
95−100
−75.8%
Forza Horizon 5 100
+81.8%
55−60
−81.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 143
+78.8%
80−85
−78.8%
Valorant 194
+76.4%
110−120
−76.4%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 95
+90%
50−55
−90%
Grand Theft Auto V 95
+90%
50−55
−90%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+75%
100−105
−75%
Red Dead Redemption 2 44
+83.3%
24−27
−83.3%
World of Tanks 300−350
+77.1%
170−180
−77.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 83
+84.4%
45−50
−84.4%
Counter-Strike 2 51
+88.9%
27−30
−88.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+87.5%
24−27
−87.5%
Far Cry 5 150−160
+76.5%
85−90
−76.5%
Forza Horizon 4 123
+75.7%
70−75
−75.7%
Forza Horizon 5 68
+94.3%
35−40
−94.3%
Metro Exodus 91
+82%
50−55
−82%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+78%
50−55
−78%
Valorant 138
+84%
75−80
−84%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 28
+75%
16−18
−75%
Dota 2 93
+86%
50−55
−86%
Grand Theft Auto V 93
+86%
50−55
−86%
Metro Exodus 37
+76.2%
21−24
−76.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 164
+82.2%
90−95
−82.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 28
+75%
16−18
−75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 93
+86%
50−55
−86%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 57
+90%
30−33
−90%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+73.3%
30−33
−73.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%
Dota 2 128
+82.9%
70−75
−82.9%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+90%
40−45
−90%
Fortnite 70−75
+82.5%
40−45
−82.5%
Forza Horizon 4 65
+85.7%
35−40
−85.7%
Forza Horizon 5 39
+85.7%
21−24
−85.7%
Valorant 73
+82.5%
40−45
−82.5%

This is how RTX 2070 Super and Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Super is 79% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2070 Super is 76% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2070 Super is 89% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 47.40 27.37
Recency 9 July 2019 26 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 215 Watt 35 Watt

RTX 2070 Super has a 73.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 514.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2070 Super is a desktop card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 5108 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 20 votes

Rate RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.