GeForce RTX 4090 D vs RTX 2070 Super

Place in performance ranking	61	2
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	46.60	9.28
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Ada Lovelace
GPU code name	Turing TU104	AD102
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	2 July 2019 (5 years ago)	28 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$499	$1,599
Current price	$261 (0.5x MSRP)	$2537 (1.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2070 Super has 402% better value for money than RTX 4090 D.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	14592
Core clock speed	1605 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1770 MHz	2520 MHz
Number of transistors	13,600 million	76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	215 Watt	425 Watt
Texture fill rate	283.2	1,149

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	304 mm
Width	2-slot	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	24 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	21 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	1,008 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	+
G-SYNC support	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	7.5	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2070 Super 47.26

RTX 4090 D 97.44
+106%

RTX 4090 D outperforms RTX 2070 Super by 106% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 2070 Super 18249

RTX 4090 D 37631
+106%

RTX 4090 D outperforms RTX 2070 Super by 106% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	132 −105%	270−280 +105%
1440p	83 −105%	170−180 +105%
4K	54 −104%	110−120 +104%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

45−50

−109%

94
+109%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 −108%	104 +108%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −120%	88 +120%
Battlefield 5	85−90 −115%	183 +115%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 −116%	119 +116%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 −110%	84 +110%
Far Cry 5	70−75 −113%	149 +113%
Far Cry New Dawn	75−80 −111%	158 +111%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −118%	174 +118%
Hitman 3	55−60 −111%	116 +111%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 −115%	279 +115%
Metro Exodus	65−70 −122%	144 +122%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 −122%	122 +122%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	120−130 −110%	252 +110%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −122%	111 +122%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −125%	90 +125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 −111%	74 +111%
Battlefield 5	80−85 −115%	172 +115%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 −118%	120 +118%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −123%	78 +123%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −118%	120 +118%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 −118%	120 +118%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −115%	258 +115%
Hitman 3	40−45 −130%	92 +130%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 −108%	270 +108%
Metro Exodus	60−65 −110%	126 +110%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 −120%	121 +120%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	95−100 −108%	198 +108%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	85−90 −113%	181 +113%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−105 −115%	215 +115%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 −117%	65 +117%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 −120%	66 +120%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −128%	91 +128%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −109%	73 +109%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −108%	83 +108%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −119%	153 +119%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 −108%	156 +108%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 −109%	167 +109%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −122%	100 +122%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −127%	68 +127%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

55−60
−107%

114

+107%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 −115%	118 +115%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 −120%	132 +120%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 −111%	57 +111%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 −121%	53 +121%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −131%	81 +131%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −124%	47 +124%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −118%	98 +118%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −108%	125 +108%
Hitman 3	30−33 −137%	71 +137%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 −115%	118 +115%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −128%	91 +128%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 −124%	123 +124%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −111%	70−75 +111%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 −113%	51 +113%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

45−50

−111%

95
+111%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −129%	55 +129%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −129%	48 +129%
Hitman 3	18−20 −133%	42 +133%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −110%	60−65 +110%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −119%	46 +119%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 −127%	68 +127%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −117%	39 +117%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −129%	32 +129%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −110%	44 +110%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −130%	23 +130%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −119%	35 +119%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −110%	84 +110%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −130%	69 +130%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −111%	57 +111%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 −107%	29 +107%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30

−119%

59
+119%

This is how RTX 2070 Super and RTX 4090 D compete in popular games:

RTX 4090 D is 105% faster in 1080p
RTX 4090 D is 105% faster in 1440p
RTX 4090 D is 104% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	47.26	97.44
Recency	2 July 2019	28 December 2023
Cost	$499	$1599
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	24 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	215 Watt	425 Watt