RTX A500 vs GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile with RTX A500, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2070 Super Mobile
2020
8 GB GDDR6, 115 Watt
36.56
+110%

RTX 2070 Super Mobile outperforms RTX A500 by a whopping 110% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking137325
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.7919.93
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU104BGA107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date2 April 2020 (4 years ago)10 November 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602048
Core clock speed1140 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speed1380 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate220.8113.3
Floating-point processing power7.066 TFLOPS7.25 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs16064
Tensor Cores32064
Ray Tracing Cores4016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1401.3
CUDA7.58.6
DLSS++

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD121
+120%
55−60
−120%
1440p78
+123%
35−40
−123%
4K46
+119%
21−24
−119%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 100−105
+122%
45−50
−122%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+114%
35−40
−114%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+120%
35−40
−120%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 100−105
+122%
45−50
−122%
Battlefield 5 166
+121%
75−80
−121%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+114%
35−40
−114%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+120%
35−40
−120%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+118%
50−55
−118%
Fortnite 164
+119%
75−80
−119%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+120%
60−65
−120%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+120%
45−50
−120%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+127%
60−65
−127%
Valorant 200−210
+117%
95−100
−117%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 100−105
+122%
45−50
−122%
Battlefield 5 152
+117%
70−75
−117%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+114%
35−40
−114%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+113%
130−140
−113%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+120%
35−40
−120%
Dota 2 130
+117%
60−65
−117%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+118%
50−55
−118%
Fortnite 156
+123%
70−75
−123%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+120%
60−65
−120%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+120%
45−50
−120%
Grand Theft Auto V 129
+115%
60−65
−115%
Metro Exodus 87
+118%
40−45
−118%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+127%
60−65
−127%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 163
+117%
75−80
−117%
Valorant 200−210
+117%
95−100
−117%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 141
+117%
65−70
−117%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+114%
35−40
−114%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+120%
35−40
−120%
Dota 2 124
+125%
55−60
−125%
Far Cry 5 105
+110%
50−55
−110%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+120%
60−65
−120%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+120%
45−50
−120%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+127%
60−65
−127%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 87
+118%
40−45
−118%
Valorant 163
+117%
75−80
−117%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 129
+115%
60−65
−115%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+112%
110−120
−112%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+123%
30−33
−123%
Metro Exodus 54
+125%
24−27
−125%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+119%
80−85
−119%
Valorant 240−250
+119%
110−120
−119%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110
+120%
50−55
−120%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+133%
12−14
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+111%
18−20
−111%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+131%
35−40
−131%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+135%
40−45
−135%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+122%
27−30
−122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+126%
27−30
−126%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 93
+133%
40−45
−133%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+125%
12−14
−125%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+133%
30−33
−133%
Metro Exodus 32
+129%
14−16
−129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 59
+119%
27−30
−119%
Valorant 200−210
+117%
95−100
−117%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 63
+110%
30−33
−110%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Dota 2 100−110
+124%
45−50
−124%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+139%
18−20
−139%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+130%
27−30
−130%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+125%
16−18
−125%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+133%
18−20
−133%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 48
+129%
21−24
−129%

This is how RTX 2070 Super Mobile and RTX A500 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 120% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 123% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 119% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.56 17.44
Recency 2 April 2020 10 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 60 Watt

RTX 2070 Super Mobile has a 109.6% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX A500, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 91.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A500 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is a notebook card while RTX A500 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2070 Super
NVIDIA RTX A500
RTX A500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 395 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 139 votes

Rate RTX A500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile or RTX A500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.