Radeon RX 7700 vs GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

Place in the ranking	194	43
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	25.94	20.07
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	TU106B	Navi 32
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	29 January 2019 (6 years ago)	2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$479

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	3072
Core clock speed	885 MHz	1900 MHz
Boost clock speed	1185 MHz	2600 MHz
Number of transistors	10,800 million	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	200 Watt
Texture fill rate	170.6	499.2
Floating-point processing power	5.46 TFLOPS	31.95 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	96
TMUs	144	192
Tensor Cores	288	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	36	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	384.0 GB/s	432.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	-	+
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2070 Max-Q 28.15

RX 7700 54.47
+93.5%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2070 Max-Q 11603

RX 7700 22447
+93.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	99 −91.9%	190−200 +91.9%
1440p	57 −93%	110−120 +93%
4K	41 −82.9%	75−80 +82.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	2.52
1440p	no data	4.35
4K	no data	6.39

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	55−60 −86.4%	110−120 +86.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 −90.5%	120−130 +90.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	76 −84.2%	140−150 +84.2%
Counter-Strike 2	55−60 −86.4%	110−120 +86.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	32 −87.5%	60−65 +87.5%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 −88.4%	260−270 +88.4%
Forza Horizon 5	75−80 −89.9%	150−160 +89.9%
Metro Exodus	93 −82.8%	170−180 +82.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 −90.5%	120−130 +90.5%
Valorant	150 −93.3%	290−300 +93.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	102 −86.3%	190−200 +86.3%
Counter-Strike 2	55−60 −86.4%	110−120 +86.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	27 −85.2%	50−55 +85.2%
Dota 2	102 −86.3%	190−200 +86.3%
Far Cry 5	83 −92.8%	160−170 +92.8%
Fortnite	140−150 −88.8%	270−280 +88.8%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 −88.4%	260−270 +88.4%
Forza Horizon 5	75−80 −89.9%	150−160 +89.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	90 −88.9%	170−180 +88.9%
Metro Exodus	68 −91.2%	130−140 +91.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	214 −86.9%	400−450 +86.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	48 −87.5%	90−95 +87.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−110 −88.1%	190−200 +88.1%
Valorant	64 −87.5%	120−130 +87.5%
World of Tanks	270−280 −83.2%	500−550 +83.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	65 −84.6%	120−130 +84.6%
Counter-Strike 2	55−60 −86.4%	110−120 +86.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	23 −73.9%	40−45 +73.9%
Dota 2	121 −90.1%	230−240 +90.1%
Far Cry 5	129 −86%	240−250 +86%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 −88.4%	260−270 +88.4%
Forza Horizon 5	75−80 −89.9%	150−160 +89.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	78 −92.3%	150−160 +92.3%
Valorant	129 −86%	240−250 +86%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	50−55 −88.7%	100−105 +88.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	50−55 −88.7%	100−105 +88.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −71.4%	300−310 +71.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	29 −89.7%	55−60 +89.7%
World of Tanks	190−200 −78.6%	350−400 +78.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	55 −81.8%	100−105 +81.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −85.2%	50−55 +85.2%
Far Cry 5	90−95 −82.8%	170−180 +82.8%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −92.8%	160−170 +92.8%
Forza Horizon 5	45−50 −83.7%	90−95 +83.7%
Metro Exodus	72 −80.6%	130−140 +80.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −87.5%	90−95 +87.5%
Valorant	95 −89.5%	180−190 +89.5%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −92.9%	27−30 +92.9%
Dota 2	69 −88.4%	130−140 +88.4%
Grand Theft Auto V	69 −88.4%	130−140 +88.4%
Metro Exodus	22 −81.8%	40−45 +81.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100 −90%	190−200 +90%
Red Dead Redemption 2	19 −84.2%	35−40 +84.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	69 −88.4%	130−140 +88.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	29 −89.7%	55−60 +89.7%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −92.9%	27−30 +92.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −90.9%	21−24 +90.9%
Dota 2	93 −82.8%	170−180 +82.8%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −90.5%	80−85 +90.5%
Fortnite	32 −87.5%	60−65 +87.5%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −87.5%	90−95 +87.5%
Forza Horizon 5	27−30 −85.2%	50−55 +85.2%
Valorant	55 −81.8%	100−105 +81.8%

This is how RTX 2070 Max-Q and RX 7700 compete in popular games:

RX 7700 is 92% faster in 1080p
RX 7700 is 93% faster in 1440p
RX 7700 is 83% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	28.15	54.47
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	200 Watt

RTX 2070 Max-Q has 150% lower power consumption.

RX 7700, on the other hand, has a 93.5% higher aggregate performance score, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7700 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7700 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.