Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano vs GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2022) | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) |
| GPU code name | TU106B | Vega 10 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 16 June 2020 (4 years ago) | 1 October 2017 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2304 | 4096 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1156 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1125 MHz | 1247 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 10,800 million | 12,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 162.0 | 319.2 |
| Floating-point processing power | 5.184 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144 | 256 |
| Tensor Cores | 288 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 152 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2048 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1375 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 352.0 GB/s | 409.6 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | - | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | - |
| CUDA | 7.5 | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 16 June 2020 | 1 October 2017 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 250 Watt |
RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh has an age advantage of 2 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 117.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh and Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh is a notebook card while Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
