Iris Plus Graphics 950 vs GeForce RTX 2060

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2060 and Iris Plus Graphics 950, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 2060
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 160 Watt
36.70
+461%

RTX 2060 outperforms Iris Plus Graphics 950 by a whopping 461% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking131570
Place by popularity16not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation40.55no data
Power efficiency15.8330.08
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameTU106Ice Lake GT2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 January 2019 (5 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1920512
Core clock speed1365 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1680 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate201.632.00
Floating-point processing power6.451 TFLOPS1.024 TFLOPS
ROPs488
TMUs12032
Tensor Cores240no data
Ray Tracing Cores30no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2060 36.70
+461%
Iris Plus Graphics 950 6.54

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2060 14147
+462%
Iris Plus Graphics 950 2519

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD119
+467%
21−24
−467%
1440p77
+542%
12−14
−542%
4K47
+488%
8−9
−488%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.93no data
1440p4.53no data
4K7.43no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+530%
10−11
−530%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 92
+475%
16−18
−475%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 79
+464%
14−16
−464%
Battlefield 5 157
+481%
27−30
−481%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 106
+489%
18−20
−489%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+530%
10−11
−530%
Far Cry 5 114
+533%
18−20
−533%
Far Cry New Dawn 128
+510%
21−24
−510%
Forza Horizon 4 205
+486%
35−40
−486%
Hitman 3 98
+513%
16−18
−513%
Horizon Zero Dawn 248
+520%
40−45
−520%
Metro Exodus 144
+500%
24−27
−500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 109
+506%
18−20
−506%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 191
+537%
30−33
−537%
Watch Dogs: Legion 254
+464%
45−50
−464%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 131
+524%
21−24
−524%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 64
+540%
10−11
−540%
Battlefield 5 140
+483%
24−27
−483%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 96
+500%
16−18
−500%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+530%
10−11
−530%
Far Cry 5 91
+469%
16−18
−469%
Far Cry New Dawn 95
+494%
16−18
−494%
Forza Horizon 4 194
+547%
30−33
−547%
Hitman 3 96
+500%
16−18
−500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 247
+518%
40−45
−518%
Metro Exodus 140
+483%
24−27
−483%
Red Dead Redemption 2 103
+472%
18−20
−472%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
+529%
21−24
−529%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+533%
12−14
−533%
Watch Dogs: Legion 244
+510%
40−45
−510%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 56
+522%
9−10
−522%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55
+511%
9−10
−511%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 71
+492%
12−14
−492%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+530%
10−11
−530%
Far Cry 5 70
+483%
12−14
−483%
Forza Horizon 4 105
+483%
18−20
−483%
Hitman 3 81
+479%
14−16
−479%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120
+471%
21−24
−471%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
+529%
21−24
−529%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 73
+508%
12−14
−508%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45
+463%
8−9
−463%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 96
+500%
16−18
−500%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+483%
12−14
−483%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+522%
9−10
−522%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+550%
6−7
−550%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 42
+500%
7−8
−500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 51
+467%
9−10
−467%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+600%
4−5
−600%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+500%
7−8
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+494%
35−40
−494%
Hitman 3 54
+500%
9−10
−500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 89
+536%
14−16
−536%
Metro Exodus 76
+533%
12−14
−533%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+521%
14−16
−521%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+478%
9−10
−478%
Watch Dogs: Legion 236
+490%
40−45
−490%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 74
+517%
12−14
−517%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40
+471%
7−8
−471%
Far Cry New Dawn 37
+517%
6−7
−517%
Hitman 3 30−33
+500%
5−6
−500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 104
+478%
18−20
−478%
Metro Exodus 52
+478%
9−10
−478%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+467%
9−10
−467%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 28
+600%
4−5
−600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24
+500%
4−5
−500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 28
+600%
4−5
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Far Cry 5 25
+525%
4−5
−525%
Forza Horizon 4 59
+490%
10−11
−490%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+513%
8−9
−513%
Watch Dogs: Legion 17
+467%
3−4
−467%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 38
+533%
6−7
−533%

This is how RTX 2060 and Iris Plus Graphics 950 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2060 is 467% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2060 is 542% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2060 is 488% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.70 6.54
Chip lithography 12 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 15 Watt

RTX 2060 has a 461.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Plus Graphics 950, on the other hand, has a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 966.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2060 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Plus Graphics 950 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 950
Iris Plus Graphics 950

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 10336 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 12 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.