Radeon PRO W7900 vs GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile with Radeon PRO W7900, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2060 Mobile
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 115 Watt
29.73

PRO W7900 outperforms RTX 2060 Mobile by a whopping 148% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking19313
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data18.09
Power efficiency18.1517.53
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameTU106Navi 31
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date29 January 2019 (6 years ago)13 April 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19206144
Core clock speed960 MHz1855 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz2495 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt295 Watt
Texture fill rate144.0958.1
Floating-point processing power4.608 TFLOPS61.32 TFLOPS
ROPs48192
TMUs120384
Tensor Cores240no data
Ray Tracing Cores3096

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data280 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB48 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/s864.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD106
−145%
260−270
+145%
1440p69
−146%
170−180
+146%
4K43
−133%
100−110
+133%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data15.38
1440pno data23.52
4Kno data39.99

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 80−85
−147%
200−210
+147%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
−137%
140−150
+137%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−138%
150−160
+138%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 80−85
−147%
200−210
+147%
Battlefield 5 104
−140%
250−260
+140%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
−137%
140−150
+137%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−138%
150−160
+138%
Far Cry 5 96
−140%
230−240
+140%
Fortnite 162
−147%
400−450
+147%
Forza Horizon 4 108
−141%
260−270
+141%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85
−144%
200−210
+144%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 171
−134%
400−450
+134%
Valorant 223
−147%
550−600
+147%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 80−85
−147%
200−210
+147%
Battlefield 5 104
−140%
250−260
+140%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
−137%
140−150
+137%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
−140%
650−700
+140%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−138%
150−160
+138%
Dota 2 118
−146%
290−300
+146%
Far Cry 5 91
−142%
220−230
+142%
Fortnite 144
−143%
350−400
+143%
Forza Horizon 4 107
−143%
260−270
+143%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85
−144%
200−210
+144%
Grand Theft Auto V 90
−144%
220−230
+144%
Metro Exodus 56
−132%
130−140
+132%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 147
−138%
350−400
+138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 111
−143%
270−280
+143%
Valorant 196
−130%
450−500
+130%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 98
−145%
240−250
+145%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
−137%
140−150
+137%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−138%
150−160
+138%
Dota 2 112
−141%
270−280
+141%
Far Cry 5 84
−138%
200−210
+138%
Forza Horizon 4 88
−139%
210−220
+139%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85
−144%
200−210
+144%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 112
−141%
270−280
+141%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
−133%
140−150
+133%
Valorant 123
−144%
300−310
+144%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 113
−139%
270−280
+139%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200
−128%
450−500
+128%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
−141%
130−140
+141%
Metro Exodus 35
−143%
85−90
+143%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−129%
400−450
+129%
Valorant 212
−136%
500−550
+136%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75
−140%
180−190
+140%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−131%
60−65
+131%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
−133%
70−75
+133%
Far Cry 5 63
−138%
150−160
+138%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−137%
180−190
+137%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
−135%
120−130
+135%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−145%
120−130
+145%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 74
−143%
180−190
+143%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
−139%
55−60
+139%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
−136%
130−140
+136%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−140%
60−65
+140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
−144%
95−100
+144%
Valorant 171
−134%
400−450
+134%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 42
−138%
100−105
+138%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%
Dota 2 87
−141%
210−220
+141%
Far Cry 5 33
−142%
80−85
+142%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−135%
120−130
+135%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−132%
65−70
+132%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 38
−137%
90−95
+137%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 34
−135%
80−85
+135%

This is how RTX 2060 Mobile and PRO W7900 compete in popular games:

  • PRO W7900 is 145% faster in 1080p
  • PRO W7900 is 146% faster in 1440p
  • PRO W7900 is 133% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.73 73.64
Recency 29 January 2019 13 April 2023
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 295 Watt

RTX 2060 Mobile has 156.5% lower power consumption.

PRO W7900, on the other hand, has a 147.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon PRO W7900 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon PRO W7900 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2060
AMD Radeon PRO W7900
Radeon PRO W7900

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1776 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 81 vote

Rate Radeon PRO W7900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile or Radeon PRO W7900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.