T1000 8 GB vs GeForce RTX 2060 Super

Place in performance ranking	77	266
Place by popularity	19	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	29.51	6.68
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Turing TU106	TU117
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	2 July 2019 (5 years ago)	6 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$399	no data
Current price	$374 (0.9x MSRP)	$690

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2060 Super has 342% better value for money than T1000 8 GB.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2176	896
Core clock speed	1470 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1650 MHz	1395 MHz
Number of transistors	10,800 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	175 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	224.4	78.12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	229 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	10 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	4x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI	+	no data
G-SYNC support	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	7.5	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2060 Super 42.88
+118%

T1000 8 GB 19.70

GeForce RTX 2060 Super outperforms T1000 8 GB by 118% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 2060 Super 16559
+118%

T1000 8 GB 7609

GeForce RTX 2060 Super outperforms T1000 8 GB by 118% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	117 +134%	50−55 −134%
1440p	69 +130%	30−35 −130%
4K	45 +150%	18−21 −150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

190−200

+116%

88
−116%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	210−220 +108%	101 −108%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	170−180 +110%	81 −110%
Battlefield 5	350−400 +115%	163 −115%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	220−230 +116%	102 −116%
Cyberpunk 2077	170−180 +115%	79 −115%
Far Cry 5	280−290 +115%	130 −115%
Far Cry New Dawn	300−310 +108%	144 −108%
Forza Horizon 4	300−310 +97.4%	152 −97.4%
Hitman 3	200−210 +113%	94 −113%
Horizon Zero Dawn	500−550 +116%	231 −116%
Metro Exodus	300−310 +108%	144 −108%
Red Dead Redemption 2	260−270 +113%	122 −113%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	450−500 +97.4%	228 −97.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	220−230 +112%	104 −112%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	180−190 +112%	85 −112%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	140−150 +106%	68 −106%
Battlefield 5	300−310 +100%	150 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	200−210 +111%	95 −111%
Cyberpunk 2077	150−160 +111%	71 −111%
Far Cry 5	230−240 +113%	108 −113%
Far Cry New Dawn	230−240 +117%	106 −117%
Forza Horizon 4	550−600 +103%	271 −103%
Hitman 3	160−170 +108%	77 −108%
Horizon Zero Dawn	600−650 +105%	293 −105%
Metro Exodus	280−290 +112%	132 −112%
Red Dead Redemption 2	260−270 +115%	121 −115%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	400−450 +117%	184 −117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	350−400 +115%	163 −115%
Watch Dogs: Legion	450−500 +108%	216 −108%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	130−140 +113%	61 −113%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	130−140 +113%	61 −113%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	150−160 +111%	71 −111%
Cyberpunk 2077	130−140 +110%	62 −110%
Far Cry 5	160−170 +116%	74 −116%
Forza Horizon 4	260−270 +117%	120 −117%
Horizon Zero Dawn	280−290 +114%	131 −114%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	300−310 +92.3%	156 −92.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	180−190 +112%	85 −112%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +103%	59 −103%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

240−250
+111%

114

−111%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	200−210 +108%	96 −108%
Far Cry New Dawn	240−250 +111%	114 −111%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	110−120 +112%	52 −112%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−105 +113%	47 −113%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	150−160 +114%	70 −114%
Cyberpunk 2077	85−90 +113%	40 −113%
Far Cry 5	190−200 +116%	88 −116%
Forza Horizon 4	210−220 +114%	98 −114%
Hitman 3	120−130 +107%	58 −107%
Horizon Zero Dawn	210−220 +112%	99 −112%
Metro Exodus	180−190 +107%	87 −107%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	240−250 +111%	114 −111%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	130−140 +103%	60−65 −103%
Watch Dogs: Legion	95−100 +116%	44 −116%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

170−180

+107%

82
−107%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	100−105 +113%	47 −113%
Far Cry New Dawn	85−90 +107%	41 −107%
Hitman 3	80−85 +105%	39 −105%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +114%	55−60 −114%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 +111%	38 −111%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120−130 +103%	59 −103%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 +114%	35 −114%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 +107%	29 −107%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 +117%	30 −117%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +111%	19 −111%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +117%	30 −117%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +109%	67 −109%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +114%	56 −114%
Metro Exodus	100−105 +104%	49 −104%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +100%	25 −100%