ATI Radeon X1650 SE vs GeForce RTX 2060 Super

Place in the ranking	89	1399
Place by popularity	15	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	46.60	no data
Power efficiency	16.93	0.46
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)
GPU code name	TU106	RV515
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	9 July 2019 (5 years ago)	2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$399	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2176	no data
Core clock speed	1470 MHz	635 MHz
Boost clock speed	1650 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	10,800 million	107 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	175 Watt	27 Watt
Texture fill rate	224.4	2.540
Floating-point processing power	7.181 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	64	4
TMUs	136	4
Tensor Cores	272	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	34	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Length	229 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	DDR2
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	800 MBps
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	12.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI	+	-
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model	6.5	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	2.1
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2060 Super 42.93
+23750%

ATI X1650 SE 0.18

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2060 Super 16509
+23152%

ATI X1650 SE 71

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	118	-0−1
1440p	67	-0−1
4K	43	-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.38	no data
1440p	5.96	no data
4K	9.28	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	91	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	88	0−1
Elden Ring	121	0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	90	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	73	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	77	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	228	0−1
Metro Exodus	127	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	122	0−1
Valorant	202	0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	156	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	64	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	67	0−1
Dota 2	159	0−1
Elden Ring	138	0−1
Far Cry 5	122	0−1
Fortnite	149	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	184	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	139	0−1
Metro Exodus	91	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	241 +24000%	1−2 −24000%
Red Dead Redemption 2	59	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	150−160	0−1
Valorant	105	0−1
World of Tanks	270−280 +27800%	1−2 −27800%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	82	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	59	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	58	0−1
Dota 2	185	0−1
Far Cry 5	100−110	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	156	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	127	0−1
Valorant	180	0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	86	0−1
Elden Ring	78	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	86	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	38	0−1
World of Tanks	270−280 +27000%	1−2 −27000%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	74	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	39	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	38	0−1
Far Cry 5	130−140	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	114	0−1
Metro Exodus	87	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80	0−1
Valorant	114	0−1

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	23	0−1
Dota 2	83	0−1
Elden Ring	34	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	83	0−1
Metro Exodus	31	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	138	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	24	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	83	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	42	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	45−50	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	18	0−1
Dota 2	121	0−1
Far Cry 5	65−70	0−1
Fortnite	60−65	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	65	0−1
Valorant	59	0−1