Arc A750 vs GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB

Place in performance ranking	91	73
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	24.32	21.73
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Generation 12.7 (2022)
GPU code name	TU106	DG2-512
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	7 December 2021 (2 years ago)	12 October 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$289
Current price	$530	$625 (2.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2060 12 GB has 12% better value for money than Arc A750.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2176	3584
Core clock speed	no data	2050 MHz
Boost clock speed	1650 MHz	2400 MHz
Number of transistors	10,800 million	21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	184 Watt	225 Watt
Texture fill rate	224.4	537.6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	229 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	14 GB/s	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	336.0 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	7.5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2060 12 GB 41.15

Arc A750 43.84
+6.5%

Arc A750 outperforms GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB by 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 2060 12 GB 15890
+32.9%

Arc A750 11954

GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB outperforms Arc A750 by 33% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	95−100 −7.4%	102 +7.4%
1440p	55−60 −10.9%	61 +10.9%
4K	30−35 −23.3%	37 +23.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 −12.7%	62 +12.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	80−85 −12.5%	90 +12.5%
Battlefield 5	130−140 −7.7%	140−150 +7.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 −10%	85−90 +10%
Far Cry 5	85−90 −8.2%	90−95 +8.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	100−105 −7%	100−110 +7%
Forza Horizon 4	100−105 −12%	112 +12%
Hitman 3	80−85 −12.5%	90−95 +12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	180−190 −8.3%	195 +8.3%
Metro Exodus	130−140 −10.8%	144 +10.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	95−100 −7.4%	100−110 +7.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	260−270 −9.6%	285 +9.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 −6.7%	96 +6.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 −10%	55 +10%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	70−75 −8.6%	76 +8.6%
Battlefield 5	130−140 −7.7%	140−150 +7.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 −10%	85−90 +10%
Far Cry 5	85−90 −8.2%	90−95 +8.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	100−105 −7%	100−110 +7%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 −6.7%	160−170 +6.7%
Hitman 3	80−85 −12.5%	90−95 +12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 −11.9%	170−180 +11.9%
Metro Exodus	110−120 −15.5%	127 +15.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	95−100 −7.4%	100−110 +7.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	220−230 −8.6%	239 +8.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 −8.8%	185 +8.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	95−100 −9.5%	100−110 +9.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −12.5%	45 +12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 −15%	69 +15%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 −10%	85−90 +10%
Far Cry 5	85−90 −8.2%	90−95 +8.2%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −12.5%	90 +12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−105 −13%	113 +13%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	180−190 −10.6%	199 +10.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 −15%	69 +15%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −14.5%	63 +14.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

95−100
−7.4%

100−110

+7.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 −7.5%	85−90 +7.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	120−130 −6.7%	128 +6.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −8.6%	38 +8.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50−55 −8%	54 +8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	60−65 −13.3%	65−70 +13.3%
Far Cry 5	70−75 −8.6%	76 +8.6%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −12.9%	79 +12.9%
Hitman 3	50−55 −16%	55−60 +16%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90 −8.2%	92 +8.2%
Metro Exodus	80−85 −7.5%	86 +7.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	130−140 −11.5%	145 +11.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 −14%	57 +14%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −11.1%	50 +11.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

70−75

−8.6%

75−80
+8.6%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −12.5%	45−50 +12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −8.6%	35−40 +8.6%
Hitman 3	30−33 −20%	35−40 +20%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −14%	55−60 +14%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −10%	44 +10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 −15%	69 +15%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −16.7%	28 +16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 −11.1%	30 +11.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −7.4%	27−30 +7.4%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −8.3%	24−27 +8.3%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −10.9%	61 +10.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −16%	58 +16%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −15.6%	52 +15.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −11.1%	30 +11.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

35−40

−14.3%

40−45
+14.3%

This is how RTX 2060 12 GB and Arc A750 compete in popular games:

Arc A750 is 7% faster in 1080p
Arc A750 is 11% faster in 1440p
Arc A750 is 23% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	41.15	43.84
Recency	7 December 2021	12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	184 Watt	225 Watt