UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) vs GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 2050 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 45 Watt
18.29
+424%

RTX 2050 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) by a whopping 424% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking305731
Place by popularity29not in top-100
Power efficiency28.54no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)no data
GPU code nameGA107no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date17 December 2021 (3 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204832
Core clock speed1185 MHz1250 MHz
Boost clock speed1477 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)45 Wattno data
Texture fill rate94.53no data
Floating-point processing power6.05 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs64no data
Tensor Cores256no data
Ray Tracing Cores32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1750 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4ano data
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_1
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 2050 Mobile 18.29
+424%
UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) 3.49

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 2050 Mobile 12495
+378%
UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) 2612

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 2050 Mobile 46821
+395%
UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) 9462

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 2050 Mobile 8965
+373%
UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) 1895

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 2050 Mobile 58257
+359%
UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) 12687

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD41
+193%
14
−193%
1440p34
+467%
6−7
−467%
4K26
+550%
4−5
−550%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 45−50
+475%
8−9
−475%
Counter-Strike 2 36
+414%
7
−414%
Cyberpunk 2077 47
+571%
7−8
−571%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 49
+513%
8−9
−513%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+517%
12−14
−517%
Counter-Strike 2 30
+400%
6
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 42
+500%
7−8
−500%
Far Cry 5 59
+490%
10
−490%
Fortnite 95−100
+428%
18−20
−428%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+350%
16−18
−350%
Forza Horizon 5 49
+717%
6−7
−717%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+340%
14−16
−340%
Valorant 130−140
+176%
45−50
−176%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30
+275%
8−9
−275%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+517%
12−14
−517%
Counter-Strike 2 27
+170%
10−11
−170%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+261%
60−65
−261%
Cyberpunk 2077 29
+314%
7−8
−314%
Dota 2 118
+462%
21−24
−462%
Far Cry 5 53
+489%
9
−489%
Fortnite 95−100
+428%
18−20
−428%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+350%
16−18
−350%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+717%
6−7
−717%
Grand Theft Auto V 68
+871%
7
−871%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+517%
6−7
−517%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+340%
14−16
−340%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 58
+346%
13
−346%
Valorant 130−140
+176%
45−50
−176%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+517%
12−14
−517%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+220%
10−11
−220%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+257%
7−8
−257%
Dota 2 110
+511%
18−20
−511%
Far Cry 5 49
+513%
8
−513%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+350%
16−18
−350%
Forza Horizon 5 33
+450%
6−7
−450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+340%
14−16
−340%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
+450%
6
−450%
Valorant 130−140
+176%
45−50
−176%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 95−100
+428%
18−20
−428%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+412%
24−27
−412%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+1133%
3−4
−1133%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+568%
24−27
−568%
Valorant 170−180
+403%
30−35
−403%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+456%
9−10
−456%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Far Cry 5 37
+517%
6−7
−517%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+450%
8−9
−450%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+700%
4−5
−700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+460%
5−6
−460%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+567%
6−7
−567%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+100%
16−18
−100%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+525%
4−5
−525%
Valorant 95−100
+476%
16−18
−476%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+550%
4−5
−550%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Dota 2 34
+467%
6−7
−467%
Far Cry 5 18
+350%
4−5
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+933%
3−4
−933%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how RTX 2050 Mobile and UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 193% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 467% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 550% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2050 Mobile is 2100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2050 Mobile is ahead in 57 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.29 3.49

RTX 2050 Mobile has a 424.1% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050
Intel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 2439 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile or UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.