Radeon RX 9060 XT vs GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile with Radeon RX 9060 XT, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2050 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 45 Watt
17.78

RX 9060 XT outperforms RTX 2050 Mobile by a whopping 156% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking33594
Place by popularity27not in top-100
Power efficiency28.5521.88
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGA107Navi 44
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date17 December 2021 (3 years ago)18 May 2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482048
Core clock speed1185 MHz2220 MHz
Boost clock speed1477 MHz3230 MHz
Number of transistorsno data53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate94.53413.4
Floating-point processing power6.05 TFLOPS26.46 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs64128
Tensor Cores256no data
Ray Tracing Cores3232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s322.3 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI++
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD42
−138%
100−110
+138%
1440p32
−150%
80−85
+150%
4K28
−150%
70−75
+150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 74
−143%
180−190
+143%
Cyberpunk 2077 47
−155%
120−130
+155%
Dead Island 2 57
−146%
140−150
+146%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−143%
180−190
+143%
Counter-Strike 2 67
−154%
170−180
+154%
Cyberpunk 2077 42
−138%
100−105
+138%
Dead Island 2 46
−139%
110−120
+139%
Far Cry 5 59
−154%
150−160
+154%
Fortnite 95−100
−153%
240−250
+153%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−150%
180−190
+150%
Forza Horizon 5 62
−142%
150−160
+142%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−146%
160−170
+146%
Valorant 130−140
−122%
300−310
+122%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−143%
180−190
+143%
Counter-Strike 2 40
−150%
100−105
+150%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
−150%
550−600
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 29
−141%
70−75
+141%
Dead Island 2 31
−142%
75−80
+142%
Dota 2 118
−154%
300−310
+154%
Far Cry 5 53
−145%
130−140
+145%
Fortnite 95−100
−153%
240−250
+153%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−150%
180−190
+150%
Forza Horizon 5 53
−145%
130−140
+145%
Grand Theft Auto V 68
−150%
170−180
+150%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−143%
90−95
+143%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−146%
160−170
+146%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 58
−141%
140−150
+141%
Valorant 130−140
−122%
300−310
+122%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−143%
180−190
+143%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
−140%
60−65
+140%
Dead Island 2 25
−140%
60−65
+140%
Dota 2 110
−155%
280−290
+155%
Far Cry 5 49
−145%
120−130
+145%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−150%
180−190
+150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−146%
160−170
+146%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
−142%
80−85
+142%
Valorant 130−140
−122%
300−310
+122%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 95−100
−153%
240−250
+153%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
−150%
90−95
+150%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
−134%
300−310
+134%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
−143%
90−95
+143%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−150%
55−60
+150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
−138%
400−450
+138%
Valorant 170−180
−135%
400−450
+135%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−140%
120−130
+140%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%
Dead Island 2 30−35
−142%
75−80
+142%
Far Cry 5 37
−143%
90−95
+143%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−150%
110−120
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−141%
65−70
+141%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
−150%
100−105
+150%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Dead Island 2 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−150%
80−85
+150%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−140%
60−65
+140%
Valorant 95−100
−155%
250−260
+155%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−150%
65−70
+150%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Dead Island 2 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%
Dota 2 34
−150%
85−90
+150%
Far Cry 5 18
−150%
45−50
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−142%
75−80
+142%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%

This is how RTX 2050 Mobile and RX 9060 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 9060 XT is 138% faster in 1080p
  • RX 9060 XT is 150% faster in 1440p
  • RX 9060 XT is 150% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.78 45.43
Recency 17 December 2021 18 May 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 150 Watt

RTX 2050 Mobile has 233.3% lower power consumption.

RX 9060 XT, on the other hand, has a 155.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 9060 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 9060 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT
Radeon RX 9060 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 2707 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 206 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9060 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile or Radeon RX 9060 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.