Radeon HD 7770M vs GeForce MX570 A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
MX570 MX570 A RTX 2050 Max-Q RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 3050 Max-Q RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Mobile RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
7290 7330M 7350M 7370M 7400G 7410M 7420G 7430M 7450A 7450M 7470A 7470M 7490M 7500G 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics 7510M 7520G 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 7530M 7550M 7560G IGP 7570M 7590M 7600G 7610M 7620G 7630M 7640G 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 7650A 7650M 7650M Rebrand 7660G 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 7670A 7670M 7670M Rebrand 7690M 7690M Rebrand 7690M XT 7690M XT Rebrand 7730M 7750M 7770M 7850M 7870M 7950M 7970M 7970M Crossfire 7970M X2

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX570 A and Radeon HD 7770M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

MX570 A
2022
2 GB GDDR6, 25 Watt
14.75
+368%

MX570 A outperforms HD 7770M by a whopping 368% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
MX570 A MX570 A
HD 7770M HD 7770M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking378778
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency44.977.50
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGA107Chelsea
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release dateMay 2022 (3 years ago)24 April 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048512
Core clock speed832 MHz675 MHz
Boost clock speed1155 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt32 Watt
Texture fill rate73.9221.60
Floating-point processing power4.731 TFLOPS0.6912 TFLOPS
ROPs4016
TMUs6432
Tensor Cores64no data
Ray Tracing Cores16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.65.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
God of War 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
God of War 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
God of War 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
God of War 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
God of War 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
God of War 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 14.75 3.15
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 32 Watt

MX570 A has a 368.3% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 28% lower power consumption.

The GeForce MX570 A is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7770M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A
GeForce MX570 A
AMD Radeon HD 7770M
Radeon HD 7770M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

MX570 A GeForce MX570 A
vs
GTX 1650 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
HD 7770M Radeon HD 7770M
vs
GT 750M GeForce GT 750M
MX570 A GeForce MX570 A
vs
HD 7970M Crossfire Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
RX 6600 LE Radeon RX 6600 LE
vs
Radeon 610M Radeon 610M
Graphics (Ryzen 9000) Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9000)
vs
Radeon 610M Radeon 610M
Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile
vs
RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
RX 7600S Radeon RX 7600S
vs
RTX A500 Mobile RTX A500 Mobile
M5000 SE Quadro M5000 SE
vs
Tesla T10 Tesla T10
GT 720 GeForce GT 720
vs
MX570 A GeForce MX570 A
GT 620 GeForce GT 620
vs
MX570 A GeForce MX570 A
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
vs
MX570 A GeForce MX570 A
RTX A40 RTX A40
vs
MX570 A GeForce MX570 A
MX450 12W GeForce MX450 12W
vs
MX570 A GeForce MX570 A

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 76 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 8 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX570 A or Radeon HD 7770M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.