RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF vs GeForce MX570 A

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking378not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency44.92no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGA107GB203
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release dateMay 2022 (3 years ago)11 August 2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20488960
Core clock speed832 MHz790 MHz
Boost clock speed1155 MHz1337 MHz
Number of transistorsno data45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate73.92374.4
Floating-point processing power4.731 TFLOPS23.96 TFLOPS
ROPs4096
TMUs64280
Tensor Cores64280
Ray Tracing Cores1670

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount2 GB24 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA8.612.0
DLSS++

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 70 Watt

MX570 A has 180% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, on the other hand, has a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce MX570 A and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce MX570 A is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A
GeForce MX570 A
NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 76 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX570 A or RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.