Quadro P1000 vs GeForce MX570 A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
MX570 MX570 A RTX 2050 Max-Q RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 3050 Max-Q RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Mobile RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro P1000 Quadro P2000 Mobile Quadro P2000 Max-Q Quadro P3000 Mobile Quadro P3200 Quadro P3200 Max-Q Quadro P4000 Mobile Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200 Max-Q Quadro P5000 Mobile Quadro P5200 Quadro P5200 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX570 A with Quadro P1000, including specs and performance data.

MX570 A
2022
2 GB GDDR6, 25 Watt
15.85
+37.7%

MX570 A outperforms P1000 by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

MX570 A MX570 A
Quadro P1000 Quadro P1000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking346424
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.00
Power efficiency44.0119.97
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGA107GP107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release dateMay 2022 (2 years ago)7 February 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$375

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048640
Core clock speed832 MHz1493 MHz
Boost clock speed1155 MHz1519 MHz
Number of transistorsno data3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate73.9248.61
Floating-point processing power4.731 TFLOPS1.555 TFLOPS
ROPs4016
TMUs6432
Tensor Cores64no data
Ray Tracing Cores16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno dataMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s96.13 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.66.1
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

MX570 A 15.85
+37.7%
Quadro P1000 11.51

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

MX570 A 6168
+37.7%
Quadro P1000 4479

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60−65
+36.4%
44
−36.4%
4K14−16
+27.3%
11
−27.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data8.52
4Kno data34.09

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 32
+0%
32
+0%
Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Dota 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 29
+0%
29
+0%
Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
+0%
30
+0%
Valorant 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Dota 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 27
+0%
27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+0%
16
+0%
Valorant 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

This is how MX570 A and Quadro P1000 compete in popular games:

  • MX570 A is 36% faster in 1080p
  • MX570 A is 27% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 67 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 15.85 11.51
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 40 Watt

MX570 A has a 37.7% higher aggregate performance score, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.

Quadro P1000, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The GeForce MX570 A is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P1000 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce MX570 A is a notebook card while Quadro P1000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A
GeForce MX570 A
NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Quadro P1000
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

MX570 A GeForce MX570 A
vs
HD 7970M Crossfire Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
Quadro P1000 Quadro P1000
vs
Quadro M2200 Quadro M2200
MX570 A GeForce MX570 A
vs
GTX 1650 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
RX 6500 Radeon RX 6500
vs
UHD Graphics 750 (Alder Lake) UHD Graphics 750 (Alder Lake)
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
GTX 295 GeForce GTX 295
T550 Mobile T550 Mobile
vs
RX 6550M Radeon RX 6550M
Arc A750 Arc A750
vs
RTX A500 RTX A500
Arc A750 Arc A750
vs
RX 6750 GRE 12 GB Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB
Radeon 780M Radeon 780M
vs
RTX 5000 Ada Generation RTX 5000 Ada Generation
RTX 3050 4GB Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
vs
Steam Deck OLED GPU Steam Deck OLED GPU
RX 7600 Radeon RX 7600
vs
GTX 480 GeForce GTX 480
PRO W7600 Radeon PRO W7600
vs
FirePro W9100 FirePro W9100
GeForce 930MX GeForce 930MX
vs
RTX 4070 Mobile GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 58 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 593 votes

Rate Quadro P1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX570 A or Quadro P1000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.