Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs GeForce MX570 A

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX570 A with Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), including specs and performance data.

MX570 A
2022
2 GB GDDR6, 25 Watt
15.43
+59.1%

MX570 A outperforms Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) by an impressive 59% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking323426
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2022)Xe LPG
GPU code nameGA107Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateMay 2022 (2 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Current price$1574 no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20484
Boost clock speed1155 MHz1950 MHz
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Wattno data
Texture fill rate73.92no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce MX570 A and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed12 GB/sno data
Memory bandwidth96 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3no data
CUDA8.6no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
+40%
25
−40%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
+50%
20−22
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+50%
30−33
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+50%
20−22
−50%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+36.4%
21−24
−36.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+48.1%
27−30
−48.1%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+48.9%
45−50
−48.9%
Hitman 3 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+58.5%
40−45
−58.5%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+50%
30−33
−50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+48.1%
27−30
−48.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
+50%
50
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+57.1%
35−40
−57.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
+50%
20−22
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+50%
30−33
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+50%
20−22
−50%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+36.4%
21−24
−36.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+48.1%
27−30
−48.1%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+48.9%
45−50
−48.9%
Hitman 3 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+58.5%
40−45
−58.5%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+50%
30−33
−50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+48.1%
27−30
−48.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+53.8%
39
−53.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+45.2%
31
−45.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+57.1%
35−40
−57.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
+50%
20−22
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+50%
20−22
−50%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+36.4%
21−24
−36.4%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+48.9%
45−50
−48.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+58.5%
40−45
−58.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+50%
30
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+50%
16
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+57.1%
35−40
−57.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+48.1%
27−30
−48.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
+57.9%
18−20
−57.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+40%
14−16
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Hitman 3 18−20
+38.5%
12−14
−38.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
+50%
20−22
−50%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Hitman 3 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%

This is how MX570 A and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) compete in popular games:

  • MX570 A is 40% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.43 9.70
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm

The GeForce MX570 A is our recommended choice as it beats the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce MX570 A is a desktop card while Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A
GeForce MX570 A
Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 12 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 3 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.